司法自由裁量权滥用问题的案例分析

发布时间：2018-03-26 11:13

本文选题：司法自由裁量权　切入点：积极滥用　出处：《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：在社会生活不断发展变化,而立法活动相对滞后的大前提下,司法自由裁量权的存在有其必然性,是审判组织或法官发挥其主观能动性的重要体现,对司法公正的实现具有不可或缺的推动作用。然而,司法自由裁量权滥用问题目前仍十分严重,在我国的三大诉讼法领域里都常见到司法自由裁量权滥用的案例,是司法不公与司法腐败的根源之一,今年是司法改革的攻坚之年,限制与规范司法自由裁量权滥用是其中关键的一环,本文通过发生在三大诉讼领域的一组案例,对司法自由裁量权滥用问题进行了比较全面的分析,概括出了司法自由裁量权的涵义并拓宽了其内涵,同时,进行了一系列理论创新,提出了如广义司法自由裁量权和狭义司法自由裁量权、司法自由裁量权的积极滥用和缺失、第六种力量等全新的概念和理论,为专家学者们的研究提供了新的视角,为司法体制和工作机制改革家们提供新的理论依据,以期对我国当前的司法改革做一些绵薄的贡献,促进我们国家的法治现代化建设和社会主义和谐社会的建设。
[Abstract]:With the constant development of social life and the relative lag of legislative activities, the existence of judicial discretion has its inevitability, which is an important embodiment of the trial organization or judges to play their subjective initiative. However, the abuse of judicial discretion is still very serious at present, and the cases of abuse of judicial discretion are often seen in the three areas of procedural law of our country. Is one of the root causes of judicial injustice and judicial corruption, this year is the year of judicial reform, the restriction and regulation of judicial discretion abuse is one of the key links. This paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the abuse of judicial discretion, generalizes the meaning of judicial discretion and widens its connotation, and carries out a series of theoretical innovations. Some new concepts and theories, such as broad judicial discretion and narrow judicial discretion, the active abuse and absence of judicial discretion, the sixth kind of power, are put forward, which provide a new perspective for the research of experts and scholars. This paper provides a new theoretical basis for the reformers of the judicial system and working mechanism in order to make some modest contributions to the current judicial reform of our country and to promote the modernization of the rule of law in our country and the construction of a harmonious socialist society.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926

【共引文献】