台湾地区大法官“释宪”对隐私权的界定及其启示

发布时间：2018-03-29 13:35

本文选题：台湾地区　切入点：大法官释宪　出处：《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：隐私权是公民一项不可或缺的权利,在强调人性尊严、个人主体性、人格发展完整性的基础上,保障个人生活秘密空间免受他人侵扰及个人信息的自主控制。在法治逐渐完善的今天,个人寻求生活、身体以及精神不受无端干扰的呼声日益高涨,各国纷纷将隐私权列入宪法保护的基本权利。中国大陆宪法并没有将隐私权作为基本权进行保护,只是通过法律在某些方面为有关隐私的侵权行为提供了救济,但也始终没有对隐私权作出明确规定,只是借助名誉权来保护隐私权,因缺乏直接保护必然导致其保护范围和力度大打折扣。起初,台湾地区的法律虽然也没有对隐私权的保障作明文规定,但后来通过台湾地区大法官释宪确立了隐私权的宪法地位,并在后续一些解释中对隐私权进行了进一步界定,积累了丰富的理论研究和司法经验。论文以台湾地区“大法官释宪”为选题视角,旨在通过对台湾地区隐私权的发展过程和脉络进行梳理和分析,结合相关释字解释和法学学者对有关释字解释的评析和论述,介绍台湾地区隐私权的发展,深入探讨大法官释宪对隐私权的界定、隐私权与其他权益的界限以及对大陆隐私权发展的启示,为大陆隐私权的理论研究及司法实践中侵犯隐私权案件的认定和审查标准提供借鉴。
[Abstract]:The right to privacy is an indispensable right of citizens. It emphasizes the dignity of human nature, the individual subjectivity and the integrity of personality development. Protecting the secret space of personal life from the interference of others and the autonomous control of personal information. Today, when the rule of law is gradually improving, the voice of individuals seeking to live, physically and mentally free from unwarranted interference is rising day by day. All countries have included the right of privacy in the basic rights protected by the constitution. The constitution of mainland China does not protect the right to privacy as a basic right, but provides relief for the infringement of privacy in some aspects through the law. However, the right to privacy has never been clearly defined, but only by virtue of the right of reputation to protect it. The lack of direct protection inevitably leads to a great reduction in the scope and intensity of its protection. At first, Although the laws of Taiwan do not explicitly provide for the protection of the right to privacy, the constitutional status of the right to privacy was later established through the interpretation of the Constitution by the Chief Justice of the Taiwan region, and the right to privacy was further defined in some subsequent interpretations. It has accumulated a wealth of theoretical research and judicial experience. From the perspective of the interpretation of the Constitution by the Chief Justice of Taiwan, the thesis aims to sort out and analyze the development process and context of the right to privacy in Taiwan. This paper introduces the development of the right to privacy in Taiwan, and probes into the definition of the right to privacy by the Chancellor of Justice's interpretation of the Constitution, in combination with the relevant interpretation of characters and the comments and expositions of the legal scholars on the interpretation of the word. The limits of privacy and other rights and the enlightenment to the development of privacy in mainland China provide a reference for the theoretical study of privacy in mainland China and the identification and examination standard of privacy infringement cases in judicial practice.
【学位授予单位】：青岛大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D927;D926.21

【参考文献】