审判权独立运行制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 16:17

本文选题：审判独立　切入点：程序正义　出处：《太原科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：围绕着如何让人民群众从每一个案件中感受到司法公正这一主题,司法改革的各项措施全面展开。但是,文章认为,如果司法改革不以程序正义为主旨来构建我国的诉讼制度,就不能从根本上实现司法公正,而程序正义的首要原则是裁判者中立,所以在建立以审判为中心的诉讼制度时如果实现不了裁判者中立或审判独立,司法公正就无从谈起。本文以程序正义为主旨,探讨如何通过正当程序设计最大限度地实现审判中立,从而实现每一个案件的公平与正义,进而保障司法公正。文章首先从我国审判权运行的立法环境和司法环境入手来看待我国审判权运行的生态环境。其次对本轮司法改革中有关审判权运行的改革措施进行了程序性审视与探讨。最高人民法院提出了以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革,采取了多项改革措施,为建立以审判为中心的诉讼制度起到了很大的推动作用。但是,这些改革大多都是行政性质的,更没有落实到诉讼制度层面,也就无法从根本上解决审判不独立的问题。鉴此,文章在最后,为了在正当程序意义上实现审判中立,提出了确立快速封闭连续审判和建立具有中国特色的有限多元人民陪审团两项诉讼制度,并提出了支撑这两项诉讼制度正常运行的法官高薪制,试图以正当程序为保障,构建审判独立的防火墙,从程序上遏制司法腐败,最大限度做到个案公正,最终达到司法的公平与正义。
[Abstract]:Around the theme of how to make the people feel judicial justice from each case, the measures of judicial reform are carried out in an all-round way. However, the article believes that if judicial reform does not take procedural justice as its main purpose to construct our country's litigation system, Judicial justice cannot be realized fundamentally, and the primary principle of procedural justice is the neutrality of the referee, so if the adjudicator neutrality or judicial independence cannot be realized in the establishment of the adjudication-centered litigation system, Judicial justice is impossible. This paper, taking procedural justice as the main idea, discusses how to maximize the neutrality of trial through the design of due process, so as to realize the fairness and justice of each case. First, the article looks at the ecological environment of the operation of judicial power from the legislative environment and judicial environment of the operation of judicial power in our country. Secondly, the article deals with the reform of the operation of judicial power in this round of judicial reform. The Supreme people's Court put forward the reform of the litigation system centered on trial. A number of reform measures have been taken to promote the establishment of a trial-centred litigation system. However, most of these reforms are of an administrative nature and have not been implemented to the level of the litigation system. It will not be possible to fundamentally resolve the issue of the non-independence of the trial. In view of this, in the end, in order to achieve trial neutrality in the sense of due process, This paper puts forward the establishment of two litigation systems, fast closed continuous trial and limited multivariate people's jury with Chinese characteristics, and puts forward the high salary system of judges, which supports the normal operation of these two litigation systems, in an attempt to guarantee due process, Build an independent firewall of trial, curb judicial corruption from the procedure, maximize the fairness of individual cases, and finally achieve justice and justice of the judiciary.
【学位授予单位】：太原科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】