专业法官会议制度实施情况的实证研究

发布时间：2018-03-31 21:48

本文选题：专业法官会议　切入点：司法责任制　出处：《四川理工学院学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：专业法官会议是为合议庭提供参考性意见的议事咨询机构,对于案件审理过程中发现的重要法律适用问题或者其他重大疑难复杂问题,独任法官或者审判长可以提请院、庭长召集专业法官会议讨论,其结论应当记录在卷,供合议庭参考。专业法官会议是中国特色的法院内部向办案法官提供咨询意见的专门机构,是在走向审判独立的特殊过程中,对法官自由办案能力担心而产生的一种特殊组织。它产生于2000年的审判长联席会议,正式确立于2015年。从调研的4个法院的专业法官会议的规则和运行状况来看,它已经发挥了重要的作用,大部分规则具有共同的特点。但是从运行情况来看,相对于巨大的案件数量,整体上运用较少,对于专业法官会议的运行情况,法官的评估结论是"一般",并无负面评价,且对其前景持乐观态度。为什么专业法官会议在实践中适用不多,原因在于审判中遇到自己把握不了的问题,法官们的实际做法并非申请召开专业法官会议,而是通过私人关系向学界专家口头咨询、向有审判经验的庭院长和上级同行口头咨询,这种方法高效简单,但其中的向庭院长和上级同行咨询的做法,很容易演变成变相审批。故最高人民法院应当总结这些地方规则,确立专业法官会议的下列规则:确立召集会议的原因,确立提请、召集会议的主体,确立专业法官会议的人员结构,明确专业法官会议的议事范围,明确专业法官会议的议事规则。
[Abstract]:The conference of professional judges is a deliberative advisory body that provides the collegial panel with a reference opinion. A single judge or the presiding judge may submit to the court any important legal application or other major difficult and complex problems found in the course of the case hearing. The President shall convene a conference of professional judges for discussion, the conclusions of which shall be recorded in the volume for the information of the collegial panel. The professional judges' conference is a specialized body within the Court with Chinese characteristics which provides advisory opinions to the judges handling cases, It is a special organization that is worried about the ability of judges to handle cases freely in the special process of independence of trial. It was born in the joint session of presiding judges in 2000. Officially established in 2015. It has played an important role in terms of the rules and functioning of the conference of professional judges of the four courts surveyed. Most of the rules have common characteristics. But in terms of operation, Compared with the large number of cases, the overall application is relatively small. The judges' assessment of the functioning of the professional judges' meetings is "general", and there is no negative evaluation. And optimistic about its future. Why professional judges' meetings are not used in practice, because they encounter problems that they cannot grasp during the trial, and the actual practice of the judges is not to apply for the convening of professional judges' meetings, Instead, oral advice is provided to academic experts through personal relations, and oral advice to court chiefs and superiors who have experience in trial. This method is efficient and simple, but the practice of consulting court presidents and superiors in this way is simple and efficient. Therefore, the Supreme people's Court should sum up these local rules and establish the following rules for the professional judges' meeting: establish the reasons for convening the meeting, establish the subject of the request and call the meeting, Establish the personnel structure of the professional judges' meeting, define the scope of the professional judges' meeting, and clarify the rules of procedure of the professional judge's meeting.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目(14AFX013) 最高人民法院重大理论课题(2014sp010) 中国法学会重点专项课题(CLS(2015)ZDZX10)
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】