论职务犯罪侦查权的配置
发布时间:2018-04-05 21:28
本文选题:职务犯罪 切入点:侦查权 出处:《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:职务犯罪是指国家公职人员利用职权或者违背职责,侵犯国家机关正常活动秩序,致使国家和人民的利益遭受重大损失,依照国家法律应当受到刑罚处罚的行为的总称。职务犯罪侦查作为有效遏制职务犯罪的重要手段,在当前反腐倡廉之大势下,备受社会关注,也是学术界与司法实务界研究的一个热点。通过正确有效的行使职务犯罪侦查权,以权力制约权力,不仅可以保证国家工作人员正确行使职权,更重要的是可以实现对权力的法律监督。职务犯罪侦查权的配置,就是指职务犯罪侦查权的配备与安排。目前,我国的职务犯罪侦查权由检察机关单独行使,其内部的配置模式则出现了分化,部分地区进行了一体化机制建设的有益尝试。对于目前的这种配置模式,无论是学术界还是实务界,都出现了一些不同的声音。 本文通过域外考察,借鉴国外职务犯罪侦查权配置的有益经验,以及回顾历史,梳理发展脉络,对我国职务犯罪侦查权的配置进行了一定的思考:认为由检察机关行使职务犯罪侦查权是适宜的,是符合我国具体国情的,同时,在检察机关内部,整合所有行使职务犯罪侦查权的部门,进行一体化机制建设,是今后职务犯罪侦查工作发展的方向。 全文共分为三个部分,文章第一部分是职务犯罪侦查权的配置概述。开篇先界定了“职务犯罪”、“职务犯罪侦查权”、“职务犯罪侦查权的配置”等基本概念,继而对职务犯罪侦查权的性质进行了具体分析。对于职务犯罪侦查权的性质,当前理论界和司法实务部门主要有以下几种认识:司法权说;行政权说;司法权行政权双重性质说;法律监督权说。本文通过厘清权力的外部特征与本质属性,认为职务犯罪侦查权究其性质,是形式上具有行政权某些特征的法律监督权。 第二部分论述了检察机关行使职务犯罪侦查权的依据。首先,通过域外考察,比较和研究了国外职务犯罪侦查权配置的几种模式,并总结归纳出域外职务犯罪侦查权配置模式的相关特点。其次,回顾历史,对我国职务犯罪侦查权配置的发展脉络进行梳理,并介绍了目前的现状。最后,通过分别论述我国职务犯罪侦查权配置的四种模式,并分析各自的利弊,提出了本文的观点,即由检察机关行使职务犯罪侦查权是适宜的。 第三部分对职务犯罪侦查权的内部配置问题进行了阐述。首先,梳理了检察机关内部,职务犯罪侦查机构设置及变更的历史沿革,并简要列举了目前我国检察机关的部门与职权设置。紧接着,本文提出了职务犯罪侦查权内部配置的基本构想,即实施职务犯罪侦查一体化机制建设,建立集中型职务犯罪侦查体制。此外,还要努力实现检察机关内部的“检警一体化”,在人员配置、职责分工、工作机制等方面大胆创新,提高职务犯罪侦查工作的质量和效率。最后,本文对侦查手段、侦查队伍的专业化建设、机动侦查权等职务犯罪侦查工作中的具体问题,提出了相应的完善建议。
[Abstract]:The crime refers to the use of authority or state functionaries violate duty, infringing the normal activities of the state organs to order, resulting in the interests of the state and people suffered heavy losses, in accordance with the general laws of the State shall be subject to criminal punishment. The duty crime investigation as an important means to curb crime, in the trend of the current anti-corruption. Social concern, it is also a hot point in the academic circles and the judicial practice research. Through the effective exercise of the right of investigation of official offence, to restrict the power of power, not only can ensure the country staff to exercise their power properly, the more important is that it can realize the legal supervision of the power. The duty crime detection power allocation means the allocation and arrangement of duty crime investigation. At present, the exercise of our duty crime investigation by procuratorial organs alone, the internal disposition appeared divided In some areas, a beneficial attempt has been made in the construction of integrated mechanism. There are different voices in the current mode of distribution, whether in academia or in practice.
This article through overseas study, draw lessons from the foreign configuration of duty crime investigation, and review the history, development venation, makes some reflections on our country's duty crime investigatoryauthority configuration: that the procuratorial organs exercise the right of investigation of official offence is appropriate, is in line with China's specific national conditions, at the same time, in the the internal organs, all the exercise of duty crime investigation department integration, build an integration mechanism of duty crime investigation is the future development direction.
This paper is divided into three parts, the first part is an overview of the configuration of duty crime investigation. Firstly, the definition of a "crime", "duty crime investigation", "the basic concept of job-related crimes investigation of the right configuration, then the nature of the duty crime detection power in nature for a specific analysis. The investigation, the current theory and judicial practice department mainly has the following understanding: judicial power; administrative power; judicial power and executive power dual nature; the power of legal supervision. The external characteristics of power and clarify the essential attribute of the crime investigation, that the nature of right form with some characteristics of executive power of legal supervision power.
The procuratorial organs to exercise the right of investigation of official offence on the basis of the second part. First, through overseas study, study and comparison of several models of foreign configuration of duty crime investigation, and summarizes the relevant characteristics of mode configuration extraterritorial investigation. Secondly, review the history, clarifies the development of configuration of the duty crime investigation right in China, and introduced the current situation. Finally, through four modes respectively discusses our country duty crime investigation power configuration, and analyses their advantages and disadvantages, put forward the views of this article by the procuratorial organs exercise the right of investigation of official offence is appropriate.
The third part elaborates the internal configuration of the duty crime detection power. First, combing the history of procuratorial organs, the establishment and alteration of the duty crime investigation mechanism, and briefly lists the current procuratorial organs of the Department and the authority set. Then, this paper puts forward the basic conception of the duty crime detection power internal configuration that is, the implementation of the construction of the integration mechanism of duty crime investigation establishing centralized duty crime investigation system. In addition, the procuratorial organs also strive to achieve the integration of police and procurator "in the personnel allocation, the division of responsibilities, working mechanism and other aspects of bold innovation, improve the duty crime investigation work quality and efficiency. Finally, the means of investigation. Professional construction team investigation, the specific problems of maneuvering and other crimes investigation right in investigation work, and put forward the corresponding improvement suggestions.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈娅;;检察权项下职务犯罪侦查权配置的完善[J];重庆工商大学学报(西部论坛);2008年S1期
2 王鹰 ,潘舫;英、美刑事侦查制度比较研究[J];当代法学;2003年04期
3 谢鹏程;;论职务犯罪侦查权的监督制约和优化配置[J];中国司法;2008年08期
4 任学强;;论我国职务犯罪侦查权重构[J];东方法学;2010年01期
5 曾建明;美国独立检察官制度简介[J];法学评论;2000年01期
6 龙宗智;论检察权的性质与检察机关的改革[J];法学;1999年10期
7 王国锋;;论职务犯罪侦查权监督与制约机制的改革和完善[J];法制与社会;2007年12期
8 张兆松;;论检察机关职务犯罪侦查权制约机制的重构[J];法治研究;2008年12期
9 周欣;;我国检察机关自侦权的缺陷与重构[J];中国人民公安大学学报;2007年02期
10 宫倩;全球反腐败法律成果及法律问题扫描[J];江苏警官学院学报;2003年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 河南省检察院 田凯;[N];检察日报;2008年
2 中国政法大学教授、中国法学会刑事诉讼法学研究会会长 卞建林邋中国政法大学博士研究生 封利强;[N];检察日报;2008年
,本文编号:1716553
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1716553.html