基层法院量刑规范化改革的检视与修正--以法官量刑思维的转变为视角

发布时间：2018-04-18 01:21

本文选题：量刑规范化 + 合法性　；参考：以法官量刑思维的转变为视角

【摘要】：立足于司法实践,从法院、检察院、法官、被告人四个角度,对量刑规范化的改革效果进行更为广泛深入的实证研究,并对改革过程中出现的问题进行梳理和剖析,进而对量刑规范化的价值理念进行修正。在此基础上,以法官量刑思维的转变为视角,提出在量刑过程中运用"由刑及罪"逆向思维的观点,通过"以刑寻据"、"以刑定档"、"以刑制罪"三种模式来解决量刑规范化下仍存在的量刑偏差问题。为确保"由刑及罪"逆向思维的正当运用,对该思维进行了合理规制:在运用"由刑及罪"逆向思维的过程中,不得违背罪刑法定原则。"由刑及罪"的逆向思维是对先定罪后量刑传统裁判思维的有益补充,是基于司法实践的实际需要,对量刑过程中的正向思维和逆向思维进行优化整合。
[Abstract]:Based on judicial practice, from four angles of court, procuratorate, judge and defendant, this paper makes a more extensive and in-depth empirical study on the reform effect of sentencing standardization, and combs and analyzes the problems in the process of reform.Furthermore, the value concept of sentencing standardization is revised.On this basis, taking the transformation of judge's thinking of sentencing as the angle of view, the author puts forward the viewpoint of applying the reverse thinking of "punishment by punishment and crime" in the process of sentencing.Through the three models of "seeking for evidence by punishment", "setting file by punishment" and "making crime by punishment", the problem of sentencing deviation still exists under the standardization of sentencing is solved.In order to ensure the proper application of the reverse thinking of "from punishment to crime", this paper makes reasonable regulations on this thinking: in the process of applying the reverse thinking of "punishment by punishment and crime", the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime should not be violated. "The reverse thinking of "punishment and crime" is a beneficial supplement to the traditional thinking of judgment after conviction and sentencing. It is based on the actual needs of judicial practice, and optimizes and integrates the positive thinking and the reverse thinking in the process of sentencing.
【作者单位】：中山大学法学院;广州市白云区人民法院;
【分类号】：D926.22

【参考文献】