当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

检察权的优化配置研究

发布时间:2018-04-25 04:12

  本文选题:检察权 + 优化配置 ; 参考:《华中师范大学》2012年硕士论文


【摘要】:检察权是我国宪法规定的独立权力,在我国的政治体系中占据着至关重要的地位。检察权的配置受到特定国家政治制度以及法律文化的影响,检察权设置的根本目的在于保护社会公众和国家的利益。检察权的配置不仅受理论界的关注,也引起了实务界的重视。 本文主要分为三个部分: 第一部分论述检察权的性质。该部分主要论述检察权的概念、性质和特征。界定检察权的概念是本文理论的前提。关于检察权性质的学说,主要的观点有行政权说、司法权说、双重属性说、法律监督权说和检察权说,笔者认为在我国检察权的性质为法律监督说,这是由我国宪法规定所决定的。 第二部分是关于现行检察权的配置。该部分主要分为三个方面,第一部分主要介绍了检察权的配置模式,从大陆法系和英美法系论述了不同法系的检察权模式,特定国家的检察权配置模式是受国家的特定文化和政治决定的,我国的检察权配置模式与大陆法系国家的相近似。第二部分主要介绍我国现行检察权的配置依据,检察权的配置依据是以检察权的性质为基础的,依据上文的论述,我们认为,检察权的性质为法律监督权,因此,我国现行检察权的配置应当围绕法律监督权的性质而展开,应该以完善法律监督职能为检察权配置的基本出发点。第三部分主要介绍我国现行检察权的缺陷和不足。只有认识到我国现行检察权配置的不足,并分析其原因,我们才能对症下药找到完善检察权配置的方法,当前检察权配置存在着一些问题亟待解决:例如检察权职能范围过窄、手段过于单一、效力不强等等。 第三部分是本文的核心部分,主要论述完善我国检察权配置的策略。该部分主要分为三个方面:首先第一部分介绍了我国完善检察权配置的必要性。完善检察权的配置迫在眉睫。其次介绍了完善检察权配置的基本原则。对检察权进行科学合理的配置,首先需要明确其遵循的基本原则。最后论述了完善检察权配置的具体策略。检察权的配置需要综合各种手段,从多个角度共同着力发挥检察权的职能,如扩大检察监督权的权限范围、增加检察手段、增强检察机关的强制执行权力、合理分配检察机关内设机构的权力等等。
[Abstract]:Procuratorial power is an independent power stipulated by the Constitution of our country and plays a vital role in our political system. The allocation of procuratorial power is influenced by the political system and legal culture of a particular country. The fundamental purpose of the establishment of procuratorial power is to protect the interests of the public and the country. The disposition of procuratorial power is not only concerned by theorists, but also paid attention to by practical circles. This paper is divided into three parts: The first part discusses the nature of procuratorial power. This part mainly discusses the concept, nature and characteristics of procuratorial power. Defining the concept of procuratorial power is the premise of this theory. On the theory of the nature of procuratorial power, the main viewpoints are administrative power, judicial power, dual attribute theory, legal supervision power and procuratorial power theory. In my opinion, the nature of procuratorial power in our country is legal supervision theory. This is determined by the provisions of our Constitution. The second part is about the present disposition of procuratorial power. This part is mainly divided into three aspects. The first part mainly introduces the allocation mode of procuratorial power, discusses the prosecutorial power model of different legal systems from the continental law system and the common law system. The allocation mode of procuratorial power in a particular country is determined by the specific culture and politics of the country, and the allocation mode of procuratorial power in our country is similar to that in the civil law system. The second part mainly introduces the allocation basis of the current procuratorial power in our country. The allocation basis of the procuratorial power is based on the nature of the procuratorial power. According to the discussion above, we believe that the nature of the procuratorial power is the legal supervision power, therefore, The present disposition of procuratorial power in our country should revolve around the nature of legal supervisory power, and the basic starting point of disposition of procuratorial power should be to perfect the function of legal supervision. The third part mainly introduces the defects and deficiencies of the current procuratorial power in China. Only by recognizing the shortcomings of the present procuratorial power allocation in our country and analyzing its causes, can we find a way to perfect the procuratorial power allocation according to the case. There are some problems to be solved in the present procuratorial power allocation: for example, the scope of procuratorial power is too narrow. The means are too single, the effectiveness is not strong and so on. The third part is the core part of this paper, mainly discusses the strategy of improving the allocation of procuratorial power in China. This part is mainly divided into three aspects: the first part introduces the necessity of improving the allocation of procuratorial power in China. It is urgent to perfect the allocation of procuratorial power. Secondly, it introduces the basic principles of improving the disposition of procuratorial power. The scientific and reasonable allocation of procuratorial power needs to clarify the basic principles it follows. At last, it discusses the concrete tactics of perfecting the disposition of procuratorial power. The allocation of procuratorial power needs to synthesize all kinds of means and exert its functions from many angles, such as expanding the scope of procuratorial supervision power, increasing procuratorial means, and strengthening the enforcement power of procuratorial organs. Reasonable distribution of procuratorial organs within the power of the establishment, and so on.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926.3

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 王文华,张平;关于检察权性质的思考[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年02期

2 张铁英;;论检察权的配置[J];法学杂志;2012年01期

3 蔡虹,梁远;也论行政公益诉讼[J];法学评论;2002年03期

4 张雪妲;;刑罚执行监督权的立法完善[J];法学;2006年08期

5 王鸿翼;;谈民事行政检察权的配置[J];河南社会科学;2009年02期

6 孙谦;中国的检察改革[J];法学研究;2003年06期

7 陶攀;2004年行政法年会“公共利益的界定”之议题研讨综述[J];行政法学研究;2004年04期

8 程荣;;论刑事变更执行的检察监督[J];延边党校学报;2011年01期

9 王玄玮;;论检察权的属性与运行特点[J];上海政法学院学报(法治论丛);2010年06期

10 邱学强;论检察体制改革[J];中国法学;2003年05期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 山东省泰安市人民检察院检察长 胡宗智;[N];光明日报;2008年

相关博士学位论文 前2条

1 印仕柏;民事诉讼中检察权配置研究[D];湘潭大学;2010年

2 刘清生;近代中国检察权配置与实践研究[D];湘潭大学;2009年

相关硕士学位论文 前3条

1 张学玲;刑事司法中职权配置问题研究[D];河北大学;2009年

2 范昌;我国检察权的合理配置问题初探[D];河南大学;2011年

3 斯诺;论我国检察权配置[D];复旦大学;2008年



本文编号:1799691

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1799691.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户0ccf1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com