群众参与视角下中国司法听证制度的规范化

发布时间：2018-04-29 02:14

本文选题：司法听证 + 群众参与　；参考：《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：保障人民群众参与司法是新时期全面法治的价值要求和新一轮司法改革的重要内容。司法听证有助于将司法与人民、法意与民意有机连接起来,从而成为推进人民群众有序参与司法的重要渠道。中国司法听证制度总体上处于探索期,为矫正实践中各种误读和滥用现象,有必要在一些共通性、基本性问题上逐步规范化。在群众参与的视角下,中国司法听证制度的规范化需着力解决司法听证官、听证主持人和人民听证员的规范化遴选,确保司法听证官、听证主持人的中立性与独立性,提升人民听证员的广泛性、代表性和履职能力;需构建规范化的听证评议运行机制,保障人民听证员有效而深入的听证参与;需逐步确立司法听证报告作为司法机关最终决定依据的实质效力地位。
[Abstract]:To ensure the participation of the people in the administration of justice is the value requirement of the comprehensive rule of law in the new period and the important content of the new round of judicial reform. Judicial hearing helps to link the judiciary with the people, law and will with public opinion, and thus become an important channel to promote the orderly participation of the people in the administration of justice. The system of judicial hearing in China is in the period of exploration on the whole. In order to correct all kinds of misreading and abuse in practice, it is necessary to gradually standardize some common and basic problems. From the perspective of mass participation, the standardization of China's judicial hearing system should focus on the standardized selection of judicial hearing officers, hearing presiding officers and people's hearing officers, so as to ensure the neutrality and independence of judicial hearing officers and hearing presiding officers. To promote the universality, representativeness and the ability to perform their duties of the people's hearing staff, it is necessary to construct a standardized mechanism of hearing appraisal to ensure the effective and in-depth hearing participation of the people's hearing staff. It is necessary to establish the substantive validity of the judicial hearing report as the basis for the final decision of the judicial organ.
【作者单位】：安庆师范大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金重点项目资助“司法权威生成的文化机制研究”(12AFX002) 安徽省高校人文社会科学研究重点项目资助“司法意识形态:基本理论及其认同问题研究”(SK2015A386) 安徽省哲学社会科学规划青年项目资助“司法与意识形态的关系研究:理论模式与实践形态”(AHSKQ2016D07)
【分类号】：D926

【相似文献】