社区调解中的合作主义——基于西南某市调研的分析

发布时间：2018-04-30 07:21

本文选题：社区纠纷 + 社区调解　；参考：《法制与社会发展》2012年02期

【摘要】：转型期的社区纠纷以内生型纠纷为主,外生型纠纷则与经济发达程度、城市化程度呈正比,二者均属于"可控型纠纷"。作为内生型纠纷解决机制,社区调解体现出了纠纷解决合作主义,涉及"政府/社区"与"调解者/当事人"两个维度。在未来相当长的时期内,社区调解合作主义的发展向度是:纠纷解决机制应以力量整合的面目出现,强调不同调解力量的合作;政府力量与社区调解力量合作的结果在于实现一种强制性平衡与整合性均衡,通过政府主导下的基层政府与社区力量之合作实现基层社会的有序与协调;政府力量的选择性介入须严格限制,且把握好介入的适当性,以确保社区/民众的纠纷解决自主性。
[Abstract]:In the transition period, the community disputes are mainly endogenous disputes, while the exogenous disputes are proportional to the degree of economic development and urbanization, both of which belong to "controllable disputes". As an endogenous dispute resolution mechanism, community mediation embodies the cooperation of dispute resolution, involving the two dimensions of "government / community" and "mediator / party". In a long period in the future, the development direction of community mediation cooperation is as follows: the dispute resolution mechanism should appear as the integration of power, emphasizing the cooperation of different mediation forces; The result of the cooperation between government power and community mediation force is to realize a compulsory balance and integration balance, and to realize the order and coordination of grass-roots society through the cooperation of grass-roots government and community forces under the guidance of government. The selective intervention of government forces should be strictly restricted, and the appropriateness of intervention should be grasped to ensure the autonomy of community / public dispute resolution.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：2011年度国家社科基金西部项目(11XFX026) 2010年西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划项目(2010XZYJS004)
【分类号】：D926;D669.3

【参考文献】