法院“背靠背”调解制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-30 22:19

本文选题：法院调解 + “背靠背”调解　；参考：《山东大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：当今社会,诉讼爆炸是一种普片的社会现象,传统的审判机制面对日益增长的诉讼负荷,开始显得力不从心,诉讼的成本高和迟延成为世界性的问题,调解作为一种重要的ADR方式,再度受到重视。调解,被西方人士称为“东方经验”,国内也有学者把调解称作是古中国最具有文明化代表性和最富有文化韵味的司法形式,它与传统儒家文化中以和为贵、以忍让为美德的思想相吻合,因而在历史上高度发达。如今,在构建社会主义和谐社会的大背景之下,调解发挥着举足轻重的作用,调解的方式也变得多样化,其中“背对背”调解虽然没有在法律规范中给予明确规定,但其作为在民事审判实践广泛适用的一种调解方式,一直以来学者对其褒贬不一。如何正确认识和评价“背靠背”调解方式,对于我国的审判实践具有很强的现实意义和指导意义。全文共分五章,第一张阐述了法院调解和法院“背对背”调解的含义,通过对这两个概念的内涵和外延的了解,揭示出其在现代法治的本质。第二章深入界定“背靠背”调解从而分析此种调解方式的现状并分析其内在原因,明确其在学术界是广受争议的,并且从利弊两方面进行深入分析。第三章通过比较得出“背靠背”调解方式的诸种弊端,明确了其与我国法治的基本原则其实是相违背的。第四章指出现代法制建设应该正确面对法院“背靠背”制度的缺陷,从立法、程序、监督等个方面提出完善法院“背靠背”调解的法律制度的措施和方法。第五章对该制度进行总结。
[Abstract]:In today's society, litigation explosion is a universal social phenomenon. In the face of the increasing burden of litigation, the traditional judicial mechanism is beginning to appear unable to do what it is. The high cost and delay of litigation have become a worldwide problem. Mediation as an important way of ADR, again received attention. Mediation, referred to as "Eastern experience" by Western scholars, is also referred to by some domestic scholars as the most civilized and culturally representative judicial form in ancient China. The idea of forbearance as a virtue coincides with each other and is therefore highly developed in history. Nowadays, in the context of building a harmonious socialist society, mediation plays an important role, and the ways of mediation have become diversified. Although "back-to-back" mediation has not been explicitly stipulated in the legal norms, However, as a widely used mediation method in civil trial practice, scholars have been different about it. How to correctly understand and evaluate the "back-to-back" mediation is of great practical significance and guiding significance to our country's trial practice. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter expounds the meaning of court mediation and court "back-to-back" mediation. Through understanding the connotation and extension of these two concepts, it reveals the essence of court mediation in the modern rule of law. The second chapter deeply defines "back-to-back" mediation so as to analyze the present situation and the internal reasons of this mediation, and make it clear that it is widely disputed in academic circles, and further analyze the pros and cons from the two aspects. The third chapter draws a conclusion that the back-to-back mediation is contrary to the basic principle of rule of law. The fourth chapter points out that the construction of modern legal system should correctly face the defects of the court "back-to-back" system, and puts forward the measures and methods to perfect the legal system of court "back-to-back" mediation from the aspects of legislation, procedure and supervision. Chapter five summarizes the system.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】