关于公诉意见书制作与适用的调查研究

发布时间：2018-05-06 17:04

本文选题：公诉意见 + 法律文书　；参考：《西南政法大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：公诉意见书是指在公诉案件的开庭审理中，出席法庭支持公诉的公诉人用于代表人民检察院在法庭上发表对证据和案件情况所持意见的法律文书，它建立在法庭调查的基础上，是对指控的犯罪事实进一步说明论证。现行控辩分离的庭审制度，使得公诉人在法庭调查和法庭辩论阶段的表现越来越重要，如何发挥公诉意见书在刑事诉讼中的功能，不仅仅是文书写作与发表的技巧性问题，还关系着检察机关公诉权能的有效行使。本文通过对贵阳市C区人民检察院的公诉意见书进行调查研究，分析公诉意见书在实践中运行的效果、存在的问题，并分析其存在问题的原因，提出对策建议，以期对司法实践有所裨益。全文除引言、结束语外，共分成四个部分，共1.6万余字：第一部分是调查的目的与方法。检察法律文书改革之前，公诉意见书一直被纳入检察机关内部工作文书，2002年后公诉意见书被规定为法律文书，时隔十年，公诉意见书的格式化及其规范化管理运行状态如何，是此次调查的目的。调查方法采取了案卷调查法和观察访问法。第二部分是实践中公诉意见书所存在的问题。本部分根据调查以及问题归类的需要，结合调查结果将公诉意见书存在的问题分为四个部分。首先是形式方面存在的问题：（1）公诉意见书的格式不规范，没有严格遵照执行高检院关于公诉意见书的格式规范。（2）出庭及监督的法律依据引用不当。（3）指派主体引述不正确。其次是内容方面存在的问题：（1）证据的论证解释不足，公诉人除了向法庭举证，还应当就证据到案件事实的演绎过程作出说明。（2）公诉意见过于简单、流于形式，没有达到将辩论焦点集中于诉讼争点上。（3）法律适用论证僵硬，泛泛而谈。再次是操作流程方面存在的问题:（1）公诉人制作公诉意见书比较随意，没有严格规范的制作程序。（2）公诉意见书审批程序的缺失，导致了其在制作、审批、纠错程序上的混乱。最后是公诉人的主观认知方面存在的问题，（1）公诉人对公诉意见书的认知模糊，质疑将公诉意见文书化的必要。（2）对公诉意见书的重视不够。第三部分是对公诉意见书实践中存在的问题进行原因分析。一是对公诉意见书的错误定位，将其限定在法庭调查结束后、法庭辩论开始时的公诉发言，造成公诉意见书内容的不完整。二是公诉意见书程序设计的缺陷，，造成其文书性质的虚化。三是法院、检察院对公诉意见书的重视不够，缺乏促进和保障公诉意见书发挥其诉讼价值的制度和激励措施，使得实践中公诉意见书质量堪忧。四是公诉意见书的预制性与庭审的不确定性间的矛盾，造成有的公诉意见书与公诉人在法庭上的口头发言不一致，或者有的应变能力不足的公诉人发表公诉意见形式化、僵硬化。第四部分是完善公诉意见书的建议。一是公诉意见书诉讼功能的回归。理论上对公诉意见书的错误定位，实践中对公诉意见书的重视不够，归结起来，就是由于没有认识到其作用抑或功能。（1）回归公诉意见书的论证功能，充分发挥其对刑事指控的论证。（2）回归公诉意见书记录功能，打破现实中将其作为公诉人发表公诉意见时的发言提纲。二是填补上位法规定的空白，使公诉意见书的约束对象明确化。三是规范公诉意见书的制作审批程序，使其诉讼功能得以发挥，同时实现检察业务的规范化管理。
[Abstract]:A complaint letter of public prosecution is a legal instrument used by a prosecutor in court to support public prosecution in the opening of a public prosecution case on behalf of the people's Procuratorate to publish opinions on the evidence and case in court. It is based on the investigation of the court and is a further demonstration of the alleged offences. The system of trial makes the public prosecutor become more and more important in the stage of court investigation and court debate. How to give full play to the function of public prosecution opinion in criminal proceedings is not only the technical problem of writing and publishing of the documents, but also the effective exercise of the power of public prosecution in the procuratorial organs. The public prosecution of the people's Procuratorate in the C District of Guiyang city has been prosecuted in this paper. The opinion book is investigated and studied, the effect of the operation of the public prosecution opinion book in practice, the existing problems, and the reasons for its problems are analyzed, and the countermeasures are put forward in order to benefit the judicial practice.
In addition to the preface and concluding remarks, the text is divided into four parts, with a total of over 1.6 words.
The first part is the purpose and method of the investigation. Before the reform of the procuratorial legal documents, the public prosecution opinion book has been incorporated into the internal work documents of the procuratorial organs. After 2002, the public prosecution opinion book is stipulated as the legal document. After ten years, the formatting of the public prosecution opinion and the state of its standardized management and transportation is the purpose of the investigation. A case study and an observation visit were adopted.
The second part is the problems existing in the public prosecution opinion book in practice. According to the investigation and the needs of the problem classification, this part divides the problems in the public prosecution opinion into four parts. First, the existing problems in the form are: (1) the format of the public prosecution opinion book is irregular, and the high inspection institute is not strictly complying with the public prosecution. Standard of form of opinion book. (2) improper reference to the legal basis of court and supervision. (3) incorrect introduction to the subject. Secondly, it is not correct. Secondly, there are problems in content: (1) insufficient proof of evidence, in addition to the proof of the court, the prosecutor should also explain the deduction process of the evidence to the facts of the case. (2) the public prosecution is too simple and is flowing. The form has not reached the focus of the debate on the litigation points. (3) the application of the law is rigid and extensive. Again it is the problems in the operation process: (1) the public prosecutor makes public prosecution opinions at random and has no strict standard production procedures. (2) the lack of approval procedures for public prosecution, which leads to its production, examination and approval and error correction. The procedural confusion. Finally, there are problems in the subjective cognition of the public prosecutor. (1) the public prosecutor's cognition of public prosecution opinion is vague and the necessity of filing public prosecution opinions is questioned. (2) not enough attention to the public prosecution opinion book.
The third part is to analyze the reasons for the problems in the practice of public prosecution. One is the mistake orientation of the public prosecution opinion book, which is limited to the public prosecution speech at the beginning of the court debate and the incomplete content of the public prosecution opinion book. Two is the defect of the procedure design of the public prosecution opinion book, which causes the nature of the document. Three is the deficiency of the court, the procuratorate has not paid enough attention to the public prosecution opinion book, and lacks the system and the incentive measures to promote and guarantee the public prosecution opinions to play its litigation value, which makes the quality of the public prosecution opinion in practice a bad quality. Four is the contradiction between the prefabrication of the public prosecution opinion and the uncertainty of the court trial, resulting in some public prosecution opinions and public prosecutors. Public statements in court are inconsistent, or some public prosecutors with inadequate capacity are formalized and rigid.
The fourth part is the suggestion of perfecting the public prosecution opinion book. First, the return of the litigation function of public prosecution opinion book. The wrong orientation of the public prosecution opinion book in theory, the lack of attention to the public prosecution opinion book in practice, is due to the lack of recognition of its function or function. (1) return to the public prosecution opinion book's demonstration function and give full play to its punishment. The argument of the accusation of the matter. (2) return to the recording function of the public prosecution opinion book, break the outline of the speech when the public prosecutor will publish the public prosecution opinion. Two is to fill the blank of the provisions of the upper law, make the object of the public prosecution opinion clear. Three is the procedure for the approval of the standard public prosecution opinion book. The standardized management of the present procuratorial business.

【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】