检察机关量刑建议实务研究

发布时间：2018-05-07 02:34

本文选题：检察机关 + 量刑　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：正义一直是法律所追求的最高价值目标，为了能够实现这一价值目标，我国不断在司法改革上进行探索，引进国外先进立法制度和立法理念，结合我国国情，设计出富有特色的司法制度。在一次又一次地司法改革浪潮之中，检察机关量刑建议制度逐渐被学术界和司法界所认可，并先后在全国多地的检察机关进行试点。经过多年的实践，量刑建议制度不断地发展。与此同时，我国在以最高人民检察院为代表的司法力量也相继出台了一些专门性的指导意见，由最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、国家安全部及司法部联合制定的《关于规范量刑程序若干问题的意见（试行）》已于2010年10月1日在全国范围内实施，这标志着我国在量刑建议规范化改革上取得了阶段性的重要成果，2013年1月1日最高人民检察院、最高人民法院的司法解释又为量刑建议提供了明确的司法依据,也标志着我国近年在刑事诉讼司法活动迈上了一个新的台阶。量刑建议制度的正式确立将有助于推动刑事诉讼程序的规范化和科学化，量刑建议制度的确立有利于完善刑事诉讼程序，有利于维护诉讼当事人的合法权益，有利于提高刑事诉讼的效率,实现程序正义和实体正义的高度统一，实现法律效果和社会效果的高度统一。但是由于量刑建议在我国从提出到在司法解释之中确立，尚不足二十年的时间，且至今仍未在刑事诉讼法中得以确立，在司法实践经验、法律效力位阶、制度的完备性等方面均存在着一些问题，属于正处于发育阶段的刑事诉讼制度，，我国应当充分学习和借鉴国外已经成熟的先进立法理念，结合我国的实际情况，对量刑建议制度进行发展完善，也量刑建议在我国还属于正处于发育阶段的刑事诉讼制度，还存在着这样那样的问题，尚需要通过大量的司法实务检验，以积累更多的司法经验，为该制度的发展完善奠定实践基础。
[Abstract]:Justice has always been the supreme value goal pursued by the law. In order to realize this value goal, our country has been continuously exploring the judicial reform, introducing advanced foreign legislative systems and legislative ideas, and combining with the national conditions of our country. Design a characteristic judicial system. In the tide of judicial reform again and again, the sentencing recommendation system of procuratorial organs has been gradually recognized by the academic and judicial circles, and has been carried out in many places of the country's procuratorial organs to pilot. After many years of practice, sentencing suggestion system has been developing continuously. At the same time, our judicial forces, represented by the Supreme people's Procuratorate, have also issued a number of specialized guidance opinions one after another, by the Supreme people's Court, the Supreme people's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security. The opinion on several issues concerning the Regulation of sentencing procedures (pilot), jointly developed by the Ministry of National Security and the Ministry of Justice, was implemented nationwide on 1 October 2010, This indicates that China has made important achievements in the reform of the standardization of sentencing proposals. On January 1, 2013, the judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Procuratorate and the Supreme people's Court provided a clear judicial basis for sentencing recommendations. It also marks a new step in the judicial activities of criminal procedure in China in recent years. The formal establishment of sentencing suggestion system will help to promote the standardization and scientization of criminal procedure. The establishment of sentencing suggestion system will help to perfect criminal procedure and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of litigants. It is helpful to improve the efficiency of criminal procedure, to realize the high unity of procedural justice and substantive justice, and to realize the high unity of legal effect and social effect. However, the sentencing recommendation has not been established in the criminal procedure law for less than 20 years since it was put forward and established in the judicial interpretation in our country, and has not been established in the criminal procedure law so far, in the judicial practice experience, the legal effect rank, There are some problems in the completeness of the system, which belongs to the criminal procedure system in the developing stage. Our country should fully learn and learn from the advanced legislative concepts of foreign countries and combine the actual situation of our country. The system of sentencing suggestion has been developed and perfected, and sentencing advice is still in the developing stage of the criminal procedure system in our country. There are still some problems, which still need to pass a large number of judicial practice tests. To accumulate more judicial experience, for the development and improvement of the system lay a practical foundation.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】