演进、分类与比较：J省律师介入涉法涉诉信访工作模式研究

发布时间：2018-05-08 16:39

本文选题：涉法涉诉信访 + 律师介入　；参考：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：涉法涉诉信访是信访的一个关键子项,同时也是较难处理的一个部分。庞大的存量和增量给相关责任单位带来巨大负担,也不同程度地影响了其日常工作。为应对这一问题,涉法涉诉信访责任单位在不断提高自身接访能力的同时,也试着引入社会第三方力量介入到涉法涉诉信访治理工作中来。长期的实践证明,社会力量在处理涉法涉诉信访问题上可以发挥出十分重要且独特的作用,而在这股力量中,律师以其特定的知识背景成为绝对的主力军,并由此衍生出各具特色的工作模式。在这些模式中,有的运转高效,可以有效化解涉法涉诉信访矛盾;也有的因为模式自身的局限性而在具体工作中呈现出低效的状态。为了整合和优化资源,提高律师介入涉法涉诉信访工作的整体有效性,就有必要对现行模式进行分析和比较,择优培养和推广。出于此目的,本文以管理学为视角,通过历史研究、比较分析和实地考察等方法,以律师介入涉诉信访工作实践丰富的J省为研究对象,探讨模式的演进历程并对现行模式进行归类和分析比较。文章共分为七部分,第一部分为绪论,主要介绍文章的写作背景、意义、方法及相关研究综述;第二部分界定了涉法涉诉信访的概念及内涵、介绍了涉法涉诉信访矛盾突出的现状以及相关责任单位的应对方法和困境、列出相关政策法规来验证律师介入的必要性和合理性;第三部分以律师介入涉法涉诉信访工作实践较为丰富的J省为例,全面回顾了该省律师介入的发展历程,并分析当前工作的潜在问题;第四部分是对J省现行律师介入涉法涉诉信访工作模式的盘点以及在此基础上对模式的归类,为下一章各类型的分析提供框架和依据;第五部分是基于多维度对传统型、独立第三方型、大信访型和工作站型律师介入类型的比较分析;第六部分为J市信访法律事务服务中心的案例介绍,佐证独立第三方模式的独特作用和有效性;第七部分为结论。经过上述分析与评价,文章最后得出结论:独立第三方型相对于其他三种类型更适应当前涉法涉诉信访治理工作的需要,同时也具有更好的发展前景。然而当前来看,该类型模式的推广存在着一些阻碍,主要体现为地方政府的支持力度和积极性不足。若能解决这一发展瓶颈,加大对律师第三方处理涉法涉诉信访的支持力度,同时完善对其工作的监督,便会更好地发挥律师在信访矛盾治理上的专长和独特作用。短线来看可以有效缓解信访者与政府之间的尖锐矛盾;长线来看,则有利于推进信访工作法治化进程。
[Abstract]:Litigant petition is a key sub-item of petition, and it is also a difficult part to deal with. The huge stock and increment bring a huge burden to the relevant responsibility units, and affect their daily work to varying degrees. In order to deal with this problem, the unit responsible for litigant petition is trying to introduce the social third party force into the administration of litigation petition and petition in the process of improving its ability to receive and receive visits. Long-term practice has proved that social forces can play a very important and unique role in dealing with the issue of litigation, petition and petition involving law. In this force, lawyers, with their specific knowledge background, have become the absolute main force. And thus derived from the characteristics of the work model. In these models, some of them are highly efficient, which can effectively resolve the conflicts between litigation and petition; others are inefficient because of the limitations of the mode itself. In order to integrate and optimize resources and improve the overall effectiveness of lawyers' intervention in litigation, it is necessary to analyze and compare the current mode and to select and promote the best. For this purpose, through the methods of historical research, comparative analysis and field investigation, this paper takes J province, which is rich in practice of lawyers' involvement in litigation letters and visits, as the object of study, from the perspective of management, and through the methods of historical research, comparative analysis and field investigation. Explore the evolution of the model and the current model classification and analysis. The article is divided into seven parts, the first part is the introduction, mainly introduces the writing background, significance, methods and related research review; This paper introduces the current situation of the contradiction between the petition and the petition concerning the law, as well as the coping methods and difficulties of the relevant liability units, and lists the relevant policies and regulations to verify the necessity and rationality of the lawyer's intervention. The third part takes J province, which is rich in practice of lawyers' intervention, as an example, reviews the development course of lawyers' intervention in this province, and analyzes the potential problems of current work. The fourth part is an inventory of the current mode of lawyers' involvement in litigation, petition and petition in Province J and the classification of the mode on this basis, which provides the framework and basis for the analysis of each type in the next chapter; the fifth part is based on the multi-dimensional traditional type. The comparative analysis of independent third party type, large petition type and workstation type lawyer intervention type. The sixth part is the case of J City letter and visit legal Affairs Service Center, which proves the unique role and effectiveness of the independent third party model. The seventh part is the conclusion. After the above analysis and evaluation, the paper draws a conclusion that the independent third party type is more suitable to the needs of the current litigation and petition administration work than the other three types, and also has a better development prospect. However, at present, there are some obstacles to the promotion of this type of model, mainly reflected in the lack of support and enthusiasm of local governments. If we can solve this bottleneck, strengthen the support to the third party of lawyers to deal with litigation and petition, and improve the supervision of their work, we will give full play to lawyers' expertise and unique role in the management of contradictions between letters and visits. In the short term, it can effectively alleviate the sharp contradiction between the petitioners and the government; in the long run, it will help to promote the legalization of petition work.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D632.8;D926.5

【相似文献】