承继与超越:新民事诉讼法检察监督制度解读

发布时间：2018-05-10 10:34

本文选题：民事诉讼 + 检察监督　；参考：《国家检察官学院学报》2013年02期

【摘要】：法院独立审判与检察机关诉讼监督之间内在的紧张关系决定了检察监督立法的复杂性。新民事诉讼法检察监督的修改体现了全面监督与有限监督相结合的原则,以保障检察监督的张弛有度。应进一步完善检察监督立法,将侵害案外第三人合法权益的调解书纳入检察监督的范围。作为民事执行监督的主要方式,应明确检察建议的程序性规则,使之具有程序法特征。为确保裁判的稳定性,应严格限定"再审判决、裁定有明显错误"的申请抗诉事由的适用范围,并为当事人申请抗诉设定最长时限。检察监督的对象应仅限于法院的审判与执行行为。将检察机关对法院执行的协助纳入检察监督的范围并寻求法理上的正当性,容易消解检察机关在民事诉讼中作为法律监督者的原本的角色担当。
[Abstract]:The inherent tension between court independent trial and procuratorial organ litigation supervision determines the complexity of procuratorial supervision legislation. The revision of procuratorial supervision in the new civil procedure law embodies the principle of the combination of comprehensive supervision and limited supervision in order to ensure Zhang Chi's degree of procuratorial supervision. We should further perfect the legislation of procuratorial supervision and bring the mediating statement of infringement of the lawful rights and interests of the third party outside the case into the scope of procuratorial supervision. As the main way of civil execution supervision, the procedural rules of procuratorial suggestions should be made clear so that they have the characteristics of procedural law. In order to ensure the stability of the judgment, we should strictly limit the scope of application of "retrial judgment, ruling that there are obvious errors" in the application for protest, and set the maximum time limit for the parties to apply for protest. The object of procuratorial supervision should be limited to the trial and execution of the court. It is easy to dispel the original role of procuratorial organ as a legal supervisor in civil litigation by bringing the assistance of procuratorial organ to the court into the scope of procuratorial supervision and seeking legal legitimacy.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院;
【基金】：北京师范大学“中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金”的资助
【分类号】：D925.1;D926.3

【参考文献】