论外国惩罚性损害赔偿判决的承认与执行

发布时间：2018-05-12 03:32

本文选题：外国 + 惩罚性　；参考：《中国政法大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】： 基于各国历史传统和经济情况的不同,惩罚性损害赔偿制度的适用程度也存在着差异。该制度在英美法系国家侵权行为法领域被普遍采纳和应用;而大陆法系国家则多强调民事赔偿的补偿性,对惩罚性损害赔偿应用的则不多。这种制度适用的差异就会产生这样一个问题:一国法院做出的涉外惩罚性损害赔偿判决在其他国家,尤其是不适用惩罚性损害赔偿制度的国家能否得到承认与执行。本文中笔者在对惩罚性损害赔偿制度加以介绍的基础上,从理论和实践两个角度对外国惩罚性损害赔偿判决的可执行性进行了论证,并对予以执行的比例和程度进行了探讨,最后又结合我国的具体情况,对该制度在我国的立法及司法情况加以了分析。全文共分四个部分。第一部分,对惩罚性损害赔偿的概念、制度特点、价值及运用状况等基本问题进行了简要介绍。在本章里,笔者用实证分析的方法阐述了惩罚性损害赔偿制度的制度价值,并从历史发展的角度分析了该制度在各个国家应用的差别,引出了涉外惩罚性损害赔偿判决在承认与执行过程中可能遇到的问题。第二部分,介绍了承认和执行惩罚性赔偿判决的理论基础及社会价值。在本章里,笔者先介绍了一下国际上通行的可以作为承认与执行外国惩罚性赔偿判决的几种理论基础,从理论上论证了对外国惩罚性赔偿判决应予承认和执行;同时,笔者又从实践需要的角度,从执行的必要性和可行性两个方面分析了执行惩罚性赔偿判决的社会价值。第三部分,介绍了惩罚性赔偿判决执行过程中所遇到的障碍,并针对这些障碍因素一一进行了排除,同时对执行的比例问题进行了探讨。该部分是本文的主体,共包括四个小问题。首先,笔者介绍了一下通观各国实践,构成承认与执行外国惩罚性赔偿判决的障碍因素;之后,笔者针对各个障碍因素进行了分析和论证,得出了障碍可以排除的结论;在此基础上,笔者引入了“适宜性原则”和“价值称量方法”,就承认与执行的比例问题进行了详细分析;最后,笔者介绍了国际上对承认与执行惩罚性赔偿判决的协调历程、草案的历次修订和条约的最终规定,并结合此过程分析了国际上对此问题的态度。
[Abstract]:Based on the historical tradition and economic situation of different countries, the degree of application of punitive damages system is also different. This system is widely adopted and applied in the field of tort law in Anglo-American law system, while civil compensation is emphasized in civil law system, but not in punitive damages. The difference in the application of this system will give rise to such a question: whether the judgment of punitive damages made by the courts of one country can be recognized and enforced in other countries, especially in countries that do not apply the system of punitive damages. Based on the introduction of the punitive damages system, the author demonstrates the enforceability of foreign punitive damages judgments from the theoretical and practical perspectives, and probes into the proportion and extent of their enforcement. Finally, combined with the specific situation of our country, the legislation and judicial situation of this system in our country are analyzed. The full text is divided into four parts. The first part briefly introduces the concept, system characteristics, value and application of punitive damages. In this chapter, the author expounds the system value of punitive damages system with the method of empirical analysis, and analyzes the differences of application of the system in different countries from the perspective of historical development. The problems that may be encountered in the course of recognition and enforcement of the foreign punitive damages judgment are introduced. The second part introduces the theoretical basis and social value of the recognition and enforcement of punitive damages. In this chapter, the author first introduces several theories that can be regarded as the recognition and enforcement of foreign punitive damages judgments, and proves theoretically that the foreign punitive damages judgments should be recognized and enforced. The author also analyzes the social value of the execution of punitive damages from the point of view of practical need and the necessity and feasibility of execution. In the third part, the author introduces the obstacles encountered in the execution of punitive damages judgment, and removes these obstacles one by one. At the same time, it discusses the problem of the proportion of execution. This part is the main body of this paper, including four small problems. First of all, the author introduces the practice of various countries, which constitutes the obstacles to the recognition and enforcement of foreign punitive damages; then, the author analyzes and demonstrates the various obstacles, and draws the conclusion that the obstacles can be removed. On this basis, the author introduces "suitability principle" and "value weighing method", and analyzes the proportion of recognition and enforcement in detail. Finally, the author introduces the process of coordination between recognition and enforcement of punitive damages in the international community. The last revision of the draft and the final provisions of the treaty, combined with this process, the analysis of the international attitude on this issue.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D997

【引证文献】