论我国民事审前调解制度的构建

发布时间：2018-05-13 12:49

本文选题：调解 + 审前调解　；参考：《华南理工大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：审前调解制度可以很大限度的调动、运用司法资源参与和协助调解，达到高效、成批的化解矛盾纠纷以及实际有效的降低当事人诉讼成本和法院压力等效果。以往打个官司少则数月多则数年，漫长的诉讼过程让老百姓望而生畏，但是一旦审前调解程序得到良好的落实，立案的官司就有可能迅速在一周内结案，，实践中甚至有半日结案的速度。审前调解制度是“司法为民”的一种具体体现，但作为一项新生的制度必须得到群众的充分认识及接受，只有老百姓认可的制度才会拥有夯实的社会基础。调解是纠纷的重要解决方式之一，本文主要就建立我国民事审前调解制度的必要性、可行性进行论述并分析，并借鉴了我国司法实践的现状以及国外相关制度的有益经验，拟对建立我国民事审前调解制度进行思考，以期提高办案效率、降低诉讼成本、缓解法院审判压力；并对我国传统的“调审合一”进行合理怀疑，提出调审适当分离的意见和建议，避免审判权在审前准备阶段的扩张，避免当事人自由意志受到审判权的干涉，实现有限司法资源的高效利用。从研究方法来看，本文通过比较分析、理论分析等方法，将我国的审前调解和国外的相关制度进行比较，将国内与审前调解制度相似的制度进行比较如诉前调解制度，诉外调解制度等等；除了介绍审前调解制度的基本理论外，还对其存在的必要性、可行性以及其正当性进行了探讨，并结合实践情况进行实践操作上的探索，把各地法院实施审前调解的成功经验进行了总结和思考，在此基础上提出了关于审前调解制度的构建思考。
[Abstract]:Pre-trial mediation system can be mobilized to a large extent, using judicial resources to participate in and assist mediation, to achieve high efficiency, to resolve conflicts and disputes in batches, and to effectively reduce the litigant costs and court pressure, and so on. In the past, the number of lawsuits was less than months and then years. The long process of litigation was feared by ordinary people, but once the pretrial mediation procedure was well implemented, the cases filed could be concluded quickly within a week. In practice there is even half a day to close the case. Pre-trial mediation system is a concrete embodiment of "judicature for the people", but as a new system, it must be fully understood and accepted by the masses, and only the system approved by the common people will have a solid social foundation. Mediation is one of the important ways to resolve disputes. This paper mainly discusses and analyzes the necessity and feasibility of establishing civil pretrial mediation system in China, and draws lessons from the present situation of judicial practice in our country and the beneficial experience of foreign related systems. In order to improve the efficiency of handling cases, reduce the cost of litigation and relieve the pressure of court trial, the author intends to think about the establishment of civil pretrial mediation system in China, and to make reasonable doubts about the traditional "unity of investigation and trial" in our country. The author puts forward some opinions and suggestions on the proper separation of trial investigation and trial in order to avoid the expansion of judicial power in the stage of pre-trial preparation and to avoid the interference of the free will of the parties by the judicial power so as to realize the efficient utilization of limited judicial resources. From the point of view of the research methods, this paper compares the pretrial mediation of our country with the relevant systems of foreign countries by means of comparative analysis and theoretical analysis, and compares the similar systems between domestic and pretrial mediation systems such as the system of pre-litigation mediation. Besides introducing the basic theory of pretrial mediation system, it also discusses the necessity, feasibility and legitimacy of its existence. This paper summarizes and ponders over the successful experiences of the courts in implementing pretrial mediation, and puts forward some thoughts on the construction of pretrial mediation system.
【学位授予单位】：华南理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.14

【参考文献】