监禁刑变更执行检察监督问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-16 10:18

本文选题：监禁刑变更执行 + 检察同步监督　；参考：《西南政法大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：监禁刑执行是国家强权色彩浓厚的领域,变更执行作为其核心组成部分,是容易发生执行腐败的敏感地带,金钱、人情、关系等在此大有空间可为,致使违法变更执行的案件报道层出不穷。现状的堪忧亟待检察监督的介入和加强。围绕加强监禁刑变更执行的检察监督,由于实践性强,学界对此关注不多,主要是实务部门在主导和探索相应的理论研究。在本文中笔者尝试对监禁刑变更执行检察监督的一些基本理论和在我国司法实践中出现的具体问题,及相应的完善对策进行较为系统的探讨,希望能够对我国监禁刑变更执行检察监督的完善有所帮助。本文分为四个部分: 第一部分为概述,依次介绍了监禁刑变更执行检察监督的概念、具体承担此项职能的组织形式、检察监督的内容,并总结归纳了监禁刑变更执行检察监督的特点,为下文的论述做铺垫。第二部分论述了监禁刑变更执行检察监督的必要性,本部分从理论到实践分别从四个方面论述了监禁刑变更执行检察监督的必要性:一是分权制衡原理的内在需求;二是执行监督专门性的必然要求;三是维护刑事裁判的执行力和执行正义的需要;四是司法现实的需要。通过对必要性的阐述论证了监禁刑变更执行检察监督的价值,为下文探讨加强和完善检察监督的部分奠定了基础。第三部分根据我国现行的法律规定系统阐述了监禁刑变更执行检察监督的具体程序,并结合司法现状分析了目前检察监督存在的问题,探讨监督不力的原因。在阐述具体监督程序时,笔者分为两部分展开:一是减刑、假释的检察监督程序;二是暂予监外执行的检察监督程序,对监督程序的论述覆盖到了整个监禁刑变更执行提请和决策的全部环节。在分析存在的问题时,笔者从系统程序规定的缺乏、权力配置的缺陷及监督主体自身的问题三方面展开,尽可能全面详尽地探讨了其中的问题所在。第四部分是本文的最后一部分,是回答本论文题目之问的关键所在,是本文的核心部分,笔者紧跟上文对监禁刑变更执行检察监督存在问题的分析,提出相应的完善之策。首先,针对法律规定不完善的问题,提出应发挥检察机关在完善执行规范中的积极作用;其次,针对变更执行程序权力配置的问题,提出应确定变更执行决定权的司法权属性,由法院统一行使,并在此基础上提出了两点完善审判机制的建议:一是要成立专门的审判庭,二是要确立公开听证的审理方式;再次,针对检察监督滞后的弊端,提出了建立检察同步监督机制的构想;之后,针对检察监督手段不力的问题,提出了完善检察机关纠正违法制度之策;最后,针对监所检察能力不足的问题,提出了完善监督主体的建议。
[Abstract]:The execution of imprisonment is a field with strong national power. As its core component, the implementation of change is a sensitive zone prone to execution corruption. There is much room for money, human relations, relationships, etc. As a result of illegal changes in the implementation of the case reports are endless. The present situation urgently needs the procuratorial supervision to intervene and strengthen. Because of the strong practicality, the academic circles pay little attention to the procuratorial supervision around strengthening the execution of the change of imprisonment penalty, mainly because the practical departments are leading and exploring the corresponding theoretical research. In this paper, the author tries to make a systematic discussion on some basic theories of procuratorial supervision on the change of imprisonment penalty and the specific problems in judicial practice in our country, and the corresponding perfect countermeasures. It is hoped that it will be helpful to the improvement of procuratorial supervision on the change of prison sentence in our country. This paper is divided into four parts: The first part is an overview, and then introduces the concept of procuratorial supervision of prison penalty change, the specific organizational form of this function, the content of procuratorial supervision, and summarizes the characteristics of procuratorial supervision of prison penalty change. Pave the way for the discussion below. The second part discusses the necessity of procuratorial supervision of the change of imprisonment penalty. This part discusses the necessity of procuratorial supervision in four aspects from theory to practice: first, the inherent demand of the principle of separation of powers and checks and balances; The second is the inevitable requirement of executive supervision; the third is the need to maintain the execution of criminal judgment and the need to enforce justice; and the fourth is the need of judicial reality. By expounding the necessity, this paper demonstrates the value of procuratorial supervision in the reform of imprisonment penalty, which lays a foundation for the following discussion on strengthening and perfecting the procuratorial supervision. In the third part, according to the current laws and regulations of our country, the author systematically expounds the specific procedure of procuratorial supervision on the change of prison sentence, and analyzes the problems existing in the present procuratorial supervision in combination with the current judicial situation, and probes into the reasons for the ineffectiveness of supervision. In expounding the specific supervision procedure, the author divides it into two parts: one is the procuratorial supervision procedure of commutation of sentence and parole, the other is the procuratorial supervision procedure temporarily executed outside prison. The discussion of the supervision procedure covers all aspects of the request and decision of the execution of the prison sentence change. In the analysis of the existing problems, the author starts from three aspects: the lack of system procedures, the defects of power allocation and the problems of the main body of supervision itself, and discusses the problems in detail as far as possible. The fourth part is the last part of this paper, is the key to answer the question of this paper, is the core part of this paper. First of all, aiming at the problem of imperfect laws and regulations, the author puts forward that the procuratorial organs should play an active role in perfecting the enforcement norms. Secondly, aiming at the problem of changing the allocation of executive procedure power, the author puts forward that the judicial power attribute of the power to change the execution decision should be determined. On the basis of the unified exercise by the court, the author puts forward two suggestions to perfect the trial mechanism: first, to set up a special trial chamber; second, to establish the trial method of public hearing; thirdly, to deal with the shortcomings of procuratorial supervision lagging behind. Put forward the conception of establishing the procuratorial synchronous supervision mechanism; after that, in view of the problem of ineffective procuratorial supervision means, put forward some measures to perfect the procuratorial organ to correct the illegal system; finally, aiming at the problem of insufficient procuratorial capacity of the prison, The suggestion of perfecting the subject of supervision is put forward.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.3;D925.2

【参考文献】