当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

电子证据检验在检察工作中的运用研究

发布时间:2018-05-16 09:45

  本文选题:电子证据 + 一般特性 ; 参考:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:步入新世纪以来,我国经济实力有了显著的提升,人民生活水平不断提高,生活质量不断改善。随着科技的发展和社会的进步,电子信息技术为日常生活带来巨大便利的同时,高新技术类型的犯罪也成为必须要直面的毒瘤,这就要求立法机关必须制定相应的法律法规,规范其行为。电子证据作为新型的证据模式由于其本身的独特性质,决定了其固定证据模式必定与其他证据的固定模式有所不同,这就要求我们通过专业、合法的技术手段(电子证据检验)去提取、固定证据,以寻求法律的公平、公正。本文拟对电子证据检验在检察工作中的实务进行探讨、研究,以解决目前电子证据检验在检察工作中的不足。笔者从电子证据概念、特性等理论研究出发,结合刑事诉讼中电子证据法律一般应用,将电子证据的一般特性展示出来。根据检察机关在实际案件中,如何依法确定需要收集电子证据的主体,如何规范准确的收集到案件相关的电子证据,笔者提出了以检察技术人员为主,一般证据收集主体为辅,两者相互结合的电子证据收集工作模式。将电子证据的收集工作划分为检察办案人员的常规收集和检察技术人员的专业收集。围绕检察机关在电子证据收集方面的现状和存在问题进行分析,结合电子证据检验鉴定、勘验、收集等相关工作规定,对检察实务工作提出规范化建议。
[Abstract]:Since the beginning of the new century, China's economic strength has been significantly improved, the people's living standards have been improved, and the quality of life has been continuously improved. With the development of science and technology and the progress of society, electronic information technology has brought great convenience to daily life, at the same time, the crime of high-tech type has become a cancer that must be faced directly, which requires the legislature to formulate corresponding laws and regulations. Regulate their behavior. Electronic evidence as a new type of evidence mode, because of its unique nature, determines that its fixed evidence model must be different from other evidence fixed mode, which requires us to pass professional. Legal technical means (electronic evidence testing) to extract and fix evidence in order to seek legal fairness and justice. This paper discusses the practice of electronic evidence inspection in procuratorial work and studies it in order to solve the deficiency of electronic evidence inspection in procuratorial work. Based on the theoretical research of the concept and characteristics of electronic evidence, combined with the general application of electronic evidence law in criminal proceedings, the author displays the general characteristics of electronic evidence. According to how the procuratorial organ determines the subject that needs to collect electronic evidence according to law in actual cases, and how to standardize and accurately collect electronic evidence related to the case, the author proposes that procuratorial technicians should be the main body, and the general evidence collection subject should be supplemented. The combination of the two models of electronic evidence collection. The collection of electronic evidence is divided into routine collection of procuratorial case handlers and professional collection of procuratorial technicians. This paper analyzes the current situation and existing problems of electronic evidence collection in procuratorial organs, and puts forward some standardized suggestions on procuratorial practice by combining the relevant work regulations of electronic evidence inspection, identification, investigation, collection and so on.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926.2;D918.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 李元泽;;电子证据的特征以及与其他证据种类的区别[J];开封教育学院学报;2016年03期

2 吴丹;莫海;;论检察院计算机犯罪中的电子物证检验[J];电子制作;2015年06期

3 赵峰;朱金昊;;网络诈骗案件中电子数据证据适用问题研究——以南京市公安局为实例[J];江苏警官学院学报;2014年06期

4 蒋平;;电子证据的发展历程及应用思考[J];公安研究;2014年05期

5 王新;祝轩;鲁文;;非法刑事电子证据排除规则研究[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2012年12期

6 杨郁娟;;论电子证据的司法鉴定[J];中国司法鉴定;2011年03期

7 刘杨;;论电子证据的证明力和有效性[J];信息网络安全;2011年03期

8 周晓燕;;电子证据检察实务研究[J];中国刑事法杂志;2011年01期

9 于靖;;浅谈电子证据在检察实务中的应用[J];法制与社会;2010年30期

10 王金辉;劳伟刚;;检察机关开展电子证据鉴定探析[J];中国刑事法杂志;2009年12期



本文编号:1896366

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1896366.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户21e8a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com