论我国司法审判中的法律推理
发布时间:2018-05-19 03:18
本文选题:法律推理 + 司法审判 ; 参考:《辽宁师范大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文以法律推理为切入点,首先对法律推理理论的基础问题进行了概述,在此基础上,着重对目前我国司法审判活动中运用法律推理的现状进行了详细地分析研究,探寻所存在的问题,从而引出应如何完善我国司法审判中的法律推理,以建立相对完善的司法审判法律推理机制,,充分保证判决的合理性、公正性与明确性,从而实现司法正义。 本文正文共分四部分。第一章是法律推理基本问题概述,主要从法律推理理论的历史演进、概念剖析、特点归纳和类型划分等方面进行了简单的梳理。第二章主要是围绕法律推理在司法审判中的功能和价值进行探索。第三章主要是针对我国司法审判活动中的法律推理所存在的问题及其产生原因进行研究,指出了法律推理在审判中存在哪些亟待克服的不足。第四章是从实践与理论的角度探寻在我国司法审判制度下如何完善法律推理的途径。 法律推理理论还有诸多研究方向,本文仅选取其中具有代表性和实践意义的司法审判中的法律推理加以分析。文章创新之处在于,从法律推理的基本理论下笔,对法律推理理论进行了系统的整理,并着重结合法律推理的历史、概念、属性、类型等有关问题展开研究,充分认识了法律推理在我国司法审判实践中所存在的问题及其产生原因,并以此为基础,提出了如何在我国当前的司法体制下,完善司法审判制度中的法律推理的方法;对以法律推理推动司法审判制度改革的结论,本文沿着“概念分析—必要性和价值—对策建议”的思路进行研究和分析,有助于将问题引向深入,形成标本兼治的问题解决方案。
[Abstract]:In this paper, legal reasoning is taken as the starting point. Firstly, the basic problems of the theory of legal reasoning are summarized, and on this basis, the current situation of the application of legal reasoning in judicial activities in our country is analyzed and studied in detail. In order to find out the existing problems, how to perfect the legal reasoning in the judicial trial of our country, to establish the relatively perfect legal reasoning mechanism of judicial trial, to fully guarantee the rationality, fairness and clarity of the judgment. In order to achieve judicial justice. This text is divided into four parts. The first chapter is an overview of the basic problems of legal reasoning, mainly from the historical evolution of the theory of legal reasoning, conceptual analysis, characteristic induction and classification. The second chapter mainly focuses on the function and value of legal reasoning in judicial trial. The third chapter mainly focuses on the problems and causes of the legal reasoning in the judicial activities of our country, and points out the shortcomings of the legal reasoning in the trial. The fourth chapter explores how to perfect the legal reasoning under the judicial system of our country from the angle of practice and theory. There are still many research directions in the theory of legal reasoning. The innovation of this paper lies in the systematic arrangement of the legal reasoning theory from the basic theory of legal reasoning, and the research on the history, concept, attribute and type of legal reasoning. This paper fully understands the problems and causes of legal reasoning in the judicial trial practice of our country, and puts forward the method of how to perfect the legal reasoning in the judicial system under the current judicial system of our country. On the conclusion of promoting the reform of judicial system by legal reasoning, this paper studies and analyzes the idea of "Conceptual Analysis-necessity and value-Countermeasures and suggestions", which is helpful to lead the problem to a deeper level. Form a solution to the problem with both symptoms and symptoms.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D90-051;D926.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张继成;价值判断是法律推理的灵魂[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2001年01期
2 张传新;;论法律推理的有效性[J];法律方法;2003年00期
3 罗书平;裁判文书与诉讼证据[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2002年05期
4 侯猛;中国的后现代法学研究及其前景[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);2001年02期
5 沈宗灵;法律推理与法律适用[J];法学;1988年05期
6 解兴权;法律及其推理的确定性论析[J];甘肃政法学院学报;1998年04期
7 苏力;认真对待人治[J];华东政法学院学报;1998年01期
8 金承光;从法律逻辑学的视角审视规范逻辑[J];昆明师范高等专科学校学报;2005年03期
9 苏力;判决书的背后[J];法学研究;2001年03期
10 张保生;;法律推理中的法律理由和正当理由[J];法学研究;2006年06期
本文编号:1908485
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1908485.html