从李昌奎案谈司法公正与舆论监督
发布时间:2018-05-19 10:54
本文选题:司法公正 + 网络 ; 参考:《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:近几十年以来,随着我国社会主义改革开放的不断深入,中国社会在经济、政治、文化等各个层面上都发生了极其深刻的变化,人们的思想活动也随之发生了深刻的变化。特别是在对社会现象、社会问题等看法上,由于传播媒介的多样化及现代网络的快速发展,人们的看法呈现出复杂、多变的趋势,社会舆论对社会发展和稳定带来一定、有时甚至是至关重要的影响。进入网络时代的这些年间,大量案件一经宣判或者正在审判过程中就已经在网络上炒的沸沸扬扬。许霆案、邓玉娇案、李昌奎案等案件,网民们普遍表现出对弱者的深切同情,对于公权力的满腹忧虑和普遍的不信任。网络舆论和司法公正的价值追求都是为了实现社会正义。司法审判的结果是直接关系到个体公民的切身权益,从关注自身权益及监督法律实施的角度而言,公民和媒体存在知情权,有知悉案件处理过程和结果的愿望,同时公民和媒体也有防止司法暗箱操作和司法腐败的义务和责任,如何理顺和协调处理好司法公正与舆论监督,二者之间的关系,使其各自追求的价值得以实现是当前面待解决的问题。 本文将从今年舆论热点李昌奎案件入手对“司法审判与舆论监督”这一课题展开讨论。对舆论监督与司法公正的相关理论进行概述,界定舆论监督的含义、表现形式及其特征,分析司法公正的内涵及其内在价值。重点讨论网络舆论对于司法的影响,网络舆论是把双刃剑,在促进司法正义和推进司法公正的同时,对司法的独立性及公信力也产生了冲击。通过对这正反两方面影响的讨论,借鉴国外先进经验,结合我国国情,提出在舆论监督背景下实现司法公正的制度构建以及保障机制的可行性建议,倡导加快网络舆论的立法规制,确立责任追究制度。司法机关应当加强民意沟通,正确处理、分析舆情,引导网络舆论回归理性,及时解疑释问,主动接受网络监督,使司法公正与网络民意形成良好的互动关系。
[Abstract]:In recent decades, with the deepening of socialist reform and opening up in China, Chinese society has undergone profound changes in economy, politics, culture and so on, and people's ideological activities have also undergone profound changes. Especially with regard to social phenomena and social problems, due to the diversification of the media and the rapid development of modern networks, people's views have shown a complex and changeable trend, and public opinion has brought about a certain degree of social development and stability. Sometimes even vital influence. In these years, a large number of cases have been on the Internet as soon as they have been pronounced or are in the process of trial. In the cases of Xu Ting, Deng Yujiao, Li Changkui and other cases, netizens generally showed deep sympathy for the weak, full of anxiety and general distrust of public power. The value pursuit of network public opinion and judicial justice is to realize social justice. The result of judicial trial is directly related to the personal rights and interests of individual citizens. From the angle of paying attention to their own rights and interests and supervising the implementation of the law, citizens and the media have the right to know and have the desire to know the process and outcome of the case handling. At the same time, citizens and the media also have the obligation and responsibility to prevent judicial black-box operation and judicial corruption. How to rationalize and coordinate the judicial justice and public opinion supervision, and the relationship between the two, The realization of their respective values is a problem to be solved in front of us. This paper will discuss the subject of judicial trial and supervision of public opinion from Li Changkui's case, which is a hot topic of public opinion this year. This paper summarizes the relevant theories of public opinion supervision and judicial justice, defines the meaning, manifestation and characteristics of public opinion supervision, and analyzes the connotation and intrinsic value of judicial justice. This paper focuses on the influence of network public opinion on the administration of justice. It is a double-edged sword. While promoting judicial justice and promoting judicial justice, it also has an impact on the independence and credibility of the judiciary. Through discussing the positive and negative effects, drawing lessons from the advanced experience of foreign countries and combining the national conditions of our country, this paper puts forward some feasible suggestions on the system construction and the safeguard mechanism of judicial justice under the background of supervision by public opinion. Advocate to speed up the legislative regulation of network public opinion, and establish the accountability system. The judicial organ should strengthen the public opinion communication, deal with the public opinion correctly, analyze the public opinion, guide the network public opinion to return to reason, solve the doubt and question in time, accept the network supervision actively, make the judicial justice form the good interactive relation with the network public opinion.
【学位授予单位】:兰州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 王越;梁刚;;网络舆论监督与司法审判互动——以“邓玉娇案”为例[J];北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
2 杨治;;网络舆论与司法公正的冲突与协调 以司法个案的分析为视角[J];法律适用;2009年01期
3 周建;;从许霆案看新闻自由及其界限[J];法制与社会;2009年18期
4 黄秀丽;;李昌奎案:一份“免死”判决引发的风波[J];法律与生活;2011年15期
5 刘燕玲;;浅评媒体监督与司法独立的关系[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2007年02期
6 唐光怀;;国外舆论监督立法的概要及其借鉴意义[J];湖南省社会主义学院学报;2007年02期
7 吴飞;程怡;;传媒与司法的对话——“公开与公正——司法与传媒关系研讨会”述评[J];新闻记者;2006年04期
8 惠阳;;网络媒体的舆论监督特性研究[J];新闻知识;2011年06期
9 陈婴虹;;论网络舆情对司法的影响[J];中共浙江省委党校学报;2009年02期
10 张帅;;论网络舆情与司法公正[J];知识经济;2011年07期
,本文编号:1909828
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1909828.html