论能动司法中的法官自由裁量权

发布时间：2018-05-25 07:30

本文选题：能动司法 + 法官自由裁量　；参考：《中南大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：19世纪末20世纪初美国开始流行司法能动主义,这是与其宪政制度和三权分立制度相适应的,经过百年的实践,美国司法能动主义呈现出其自身的特点。美国的司法能动主义在我国没有适合的发展环境,2008年我国面对世界金融危机的影响,司法界在“保增长,保民生,保稳定”的重大使命下,结合我国的实际情况提出了能动司法的理念。我国的能动司法虽然有一点政治色彩,但是与我国的社会发展相适应的,有利于我国缓解社会矛盾,保障司法稳定。法官自由裁量权是法官为了实现个案正义,发挥主观能动性,在公平,正义原则指导下作出合理的判决。能动司法理念需要法官自由裁量权的发挥,但是必须把握好他的“度”的问题。按照韦伯对司法权的分类,能动司法是目的性司法,是民生司法,这要求法官在自我约束的同时,注意利民和便民。我国各级法院和法官在能动司法运用的过程中,既有成功的典范,也有不足的地方。本文从司法政策,量刑和定罪三个方面的案例来分析能动司法两年来在我国的实践情况。但是无论怎样,我们可以看到的是,因为我国社会的现状和法律固有的特性,能动司法需要法官发挥自由裁量权,同时法官的自由裁量权也要受到能动司法理念从内到外的监督和限制。
[Abstract]:At the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century, judicial activism became popular in the United States, which adapted to its constitutional system and separation of powers system. After a hundred years of practice, American judicial activism showed its own characteristics. The judicial activism of the United States has no suitable development environment in our country. In 2008, our country faced with the influence of the world financial crisis, the judicial circles were under the important mission of "protecting growth, protecting people's livelihood and maintaining stability". Combined with the actual situation of our country, put forward the concept of active justice. Although the active judicature of our country has a little political color, it adapts to the social development of our country, which is helpful to alleviate the social contradiction and ensure the judicial stability. The judge's discretion is to make a reasonable decision under the guidance of the principle of fairness and justice in order to realize the justice of individual cases and give full play to the subjective initiative. The active judicial idea needs the judge's discretion to play, but must grasp his "degree" question. According to Weber's classification of judicial power, active justice is a kind of purposeful justice and people's livelihood justice, which requires judges to pay attention to the benefit of the people and the convenience of the people at the same time of self-restraint. In the process of active judicial application, courts and judges at all levels of our country have both successful models and shortcomings. This paper analyzes the practice of active justice in China in the past two years from three aspects: judicial policy, sentencing and conviction. But in any case, what we can see is that, because of the current state of our society and the inherent characteristics of the law, the active administration of justice requires judges to exercise their discretion. At the same time, the discretion of judges is also subject to the supervision and restriction of active judicial idea from inside to outside.
【学位授予单位】：中南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D916.2

【参考文献】