当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度的定位分析——基于检察视域的实证研究

发布时间:2018-05-29 12:50

  本文选题:认罪认罚从宽 + 检察制度试点改革 ; 参考:《东方法学》2017年06期


【摘要】:刑事案件认罪认罚从宽制度包含实体上"从轻"和程序上"从快"两方面含义,既存在于刑法适用定罪量刑过程中,同时也存在于刑事诉讼不同程序以及程序的不同阶段。党的十八届四中全会通过的《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》中对认罪认罚从宽制度的要求是"完善",而非"建立",这要求落实制度时要统筹协调与之相关的制度和程序,发掘这一制度的内在潜力,并补充部分内容使之系统化,并与现有法律规定对接。在实践中,应当明确参与主体、扩展案件适用范围、确定从宽方式和量刑建议,并在一定程度上补充救济途径。认罪认罚从宽制度的主要目的既包括提高效率、优化司法资源,也包括个别预防、促进公正。在运行时,应当加强监督审查,避免司法人员独断专行和腐败;充分发挥程序的效率价值,实现案件繁简分流;保障最低限度的公正,避免损害当事人合法权益。同时,在探索与推行认罪认罚从宽制度时,应当兼顾程序正义和诉讼经济两方面目标,力争实现办案的法律效果和社会效果的有机统一。
[Abstract]:The lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing in criminal cases includes two meanings: "lighter" in substance and "quick" in procedure, which exists in the process of conviction and sentencing in criminal law, but also in different procedures and stages of criminal procedure. In the "decision of the CPC Central Committee on comprehensively promoting the Rule of Law on several important issues" adopted by the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the requirement for the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing is "perfect" rather than "establishing", which requires the implementation of the system. To coordinate the relevant systems and procedures, Explore the inherent potential of this system, and add part of the content to systematize it, and with the existing legal provisions. In practice, we should clearly participate in the subject, expand the scope of application of the case, determine the lenient way and sentencing suggestion, and supplement the relief way to a certain extent. The main purposes of the leniency system include improving efficiency, optimizing judicial resources, including individual prevention and promoting justice. In operation, we should strengthen supervision and examination to avoid arbitrariness and corruption of judicial personnel, give full play to the efficiency value of procedure, realize complicated and simple cases, guarantee minimum justice and avoid harming the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned. At the same time, in exploring and implementing the lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing punishment, we should take into account the goals of procedural justice and litigation economy, and strive to realize the organic unity of the legal effect and social effect of handling cases.
【作者单位】: 上海市人民检察院研究室;
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.3

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 魏爱军;王帅;;刑事案件犯罪嫌疑人、被告人自报身份情况调研[J];法制与社会;2008年31期

2 郭浩善;论少年刑事案件审判中的观念转变[J];青少年犯罪问题;1997年04期

3 曹勇;刑事案件公开审判中的几点注意事项[J];法律适用;1999年04期

4 ;中华全国律师协会关于律师办理刑事案件的十项要求[J];中国律师;1999年07期

5 肖祖瀚;;报复社会严重刑事案件激增的四大主因[J];中国经济周刊;2013年49期

6 李立;论刑事案件中犯罪嫌疑人、被告人死亡的处理[J];中央政法管理干部学院学报;2000年03期

7 杨大民;合情合理不合法,

本文编号:1950938


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1950938.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户37150***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com