我国民事裁判文书上网研究

发布时间：2018-05-29 19:45

本文选题：民事裁判文书上网 + 法院　；参考：《安徽大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：裁判文书上网公开制度属于审判公开原则的重要体现,在司法实践中带来一系列积极的影响,一方面,有利于各级法院落实公开审判原则、全面接受群众的监督,另一方面,也能促进公民基本权利的保障,如参与权、知情权和监督权等。2012年出台的新《民事诉讼法》第156条明确规定公众有权利查阅已经生效的判决书以及裁定书。2016年10月1日起施行的《最高人民法院关于人民法院在互联网公布裁判文书的规定》进一步明确了民事裁判文书上网公开制度的内容、程序及相关保障措施,借助中国裁判文书网等平台,各级法院生效并公开的裁判文书具有统一的公开平台、公开程序、公开内容、公开保障措施,从而推动实现司法透明化的发展。与域外发达国家(地区)的民事裁判文书上网公开制度相比,我国在裁判文书质量、审核程序、检索程序、技术处理等方面依然存在一些隐患,这些不足将在一定程度上阻碍审判公开事业的发展,引起了我们的深思。通过对案例予以借鉴,各地审判机关可以明确统一的裁判标准。民事裁判文书上网制度可以有力地维护司法公正,满足公民知情权的需求,从而提升司法公信力。可以说,民事裁判文书上网是司法公开的重要方式,也是审判公开制度的主要内容。现阶段,裁判文书上网公开工作作为司法改革的重要内容,应当进一步加大执行力度。然而,当前我国的司法实践中,裁判文书上网公开制度依然存在一系列问题,如裁判文书质量不高,生效的裁判文书发布不及时等。导致这些问题出现的原因包括:确保裁判文书质量的保障机制尚未建成;裁判文书制作者的业务能力有限等等。完善裁判文书公开上网制度,应以立法的方式明确裁判文书上网公开的统一标准;处理好当事人以及其他诉讼参与人的个人信息保护问题,适当的赋予当事人选择是否公开的权利,遵循可分割原则;通过提高法官的综合素质、塑造内心正义价值、增强对法律方法的运用能力,从而更好的完成裁判文书的制作工作,提现出裁判文书的公正性,使社会公众对司法机关更加信服;实行激励机制和奖惩机制,逐步提高公开裁判文书的质量;最后,通过完善裁判文书查询系统,加大网络硬件建设,完善裁判文书的公开平台。
[Abstract]:The open system of judgment documents online belongs to the important embodiment of the principle of open trial, which brings a series of positive influences in judicial practice. On the one hand, it is beneficial for courts at all levels to implement the principle of open trial and accept the supervision of the masses, on the other hand, It also promotes the guarantee of the fundamental rights of citizens, such as the right to participate, The right to know and the right to supervise etc. Article 156 of the new Civil procedure Law promulgated in 2012 clearly stipulates that the public has the right to consult the judgments that have come into force as well as the ruling. The people's Law of the Supreme people's Court came into effect on October 1, 2016. The court has further clarified the contents of the open online system of civil adjudication documents by publishing the provisions of the adjudication documents on the Internet. Procedures and related safeguards, with the help of platforms such as the China judgment documents Network, the courts at all levels have a unified open platform, open procedures, open content, and open safeguards for judicial documents that are effective and open to the public. In order to promote the development of judicial transparency. Compared with the open online system of civil adjudication documents in foreign developed countries (regions), there are still some hidden dangers in our country in terms of the quality of adjudication documents, examination procedures, retrieval procedures, technical processing, and so on. These deficiencies will hinder the development of open trial to a certain extent, causing us to ponder. By using the case for reference, the local judicial organs can clearly unify the standard of adjudication. The online system of civil judgment documents can maintain judicial justice and meet the needs of citizens' right to know, thus enhancing the judicial credibility. It can be said that the Internet of civil adjudication documents is an important way of judicial openness, and also the main content of open trial system. At present, as an important part of judicial reform, judicial documents online publicity should be further strengthened. However, in the current judicial practice of our country, there are still a series of problems in the system of online publication of adjudicative documents, such as the low quality of adjudicative documents and the untimely issuance of effective adjudicatory documents. The causes of these problems include: the guarantee mechanism to ensure the quality of adjudicative documents has not yet been established; the professional ability of the umpire producers is limited, and so on. In order to perfect the system of open Internet access of adjudicative documents, we should make clear by legislation the unified standard of online disclosure of adjudicative documents, deal well with the protection of personal information of the parties and other litigant participants, To give the parties the right to choose whether to be public or not, to follow the principle of divisibility; to improve the comprehensive quality of judges, to shape the value of inner justice, to enhance the ability to use legal methods, and thus to better complete the production of judicial documents. Show the fairness of the judicial documents, make the public more convinced of the judicial organs; implement the incentive mechanism and reward and punishment mechanism, gradually improve the quality of open adjudication documents; finally, through the improvement of the judicial documents inquiry system, Increase the construction of network hardware, improve the open platform of referee documents.
【学位授予单位】：安徽大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.13;D925.1

【参考文献】