论民意对法官自由裁量权的影响与协调

发布时间：2018-05-30 11:02

本文选题：民意 + 法官自由裁量权　；参考：《兰州大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我们建立法治社会的今天,各种各样的普法宣传工作开展的有声有色。就是在这样一种氛围下,民众对司法方面的问题日渐关注,民意对司法领域中法官自由裁量权的影响问题也越来越突出。法官自由裁量权的行使是否反映民意似乎关系到司法的公正,影响到司法的权威及实施效果。本文采用例证法、引证法、归纳法等方法,首先将民意对司法领域法官自由裁量权的影响进行全面总结,其中包括上至最高院,下至基层法院等部门领导均对此问题非常重视。使民意对司法影响的重要性得到证明。其次对民意影响的两面性,即正面影响及负面影响进行详细分析。正面影响有弥补法律漏洞、有助于树立司法权威、有利于社会安定团结,负面影响有侵犯了法官审判独立性原则、民意容易被一些人利于等,有了对影响的两面性的分析,使此后提出的制度构建更具有针对性。在此基础上,参考了我国目前及世界上一些国家在相关领域的做法后,提出了符合我国国情的建立法院民意机构的设想,并就法院民意机构组成人选方面、履行工作时间、经费补偿等问题进行详细阐述,以此希望解决民意对司法影响的不规范性及存在的负面影响的问题。在建立良好制度的前提下,让民意能充分发挥其合理的方面的优势,使民意最终通过一种顺畅的、合法的、有效的、积极的方式导入司法领域。
[Abstract]:In our establishment of the rule of law society today, a variety of publicity work carried out in full force. In such an atmosphere, people pay more and more attention to the judicial issues, and the influence of public opinion on the discretion of judges in the judicial field is becoming more and more prominent. Whether the exercise of the judge's discretion reflects public opinion seems to have a bearing on the justice of justice, the authority of the judiciary and the effect of its implementation. This paper uses the methods of example, citation and induction to sum up the influence of public opinion on the discretionary power of judges in the judicial field, including the leaders of departments from the Supreme Court to the grassroots courts, all of which attach great importance to this problem. To prove the importance of public opinion in the administration of justice. Secondly, the two sides of the influence of public opinion, that is, positive impact and negative impact, are analyzed in detail. The positive influence has made up the legal loophole, is helpful to establish the judicial authority, is advantageous to the social stability and unity, the negative influence has violated the judge trial independence principle, the public opinion is easy to be favored by some people, and so on. So that the proposed system is more targeted. On this basis, after referring to the current practices of China and some countries in the world in the relevant fields, the paper puts forward the idea of establishing a public opinion organ of the Court in line with the national conditions of our country, and performs its working hours with regard to the composition of the public opinion organ of the Court. In order to solve the problem of non-standard and negative influence of public opinion on judicature, this paper expounds the problem of compensation of funds in detail. Under the premise of establishing a good system, the public opinion can give full play to its reasonable advantages, so that public opinion can finally pass through a smooth, legal, effective and positive way into the judicial field.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】