检察机关反渎职侵权法律监督现状及完善路径

发布时间：2018-06-03 19:58

本文选题：反渎职侵权 + 行政机关　；参考：《兰州大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：人民检察院反渎职侵权部门通过查办渎职侵权案件而行使侦查权从而履行检察机关法律监督权,对行政权和司法权进行监督制约,实现强化法律监督、维护公平正义的司法目标。如果说检察机关公诉部门的公诉工作是净化社会治安综合治理的环境,那么反渎职侵权部门的查办工作则是净化社会政务执法环境。但就实务中对行政机关施行法律监督的现状来看,还存在很多问题,制约了法律监督功能的全面发挥。本文通过分析查找反渎职侵权部门履职时存在的相关问题和制约反渎职侵权工作的根本原因,提出了几点建议。本论文分为五节,具体安排如下：第一节概要介绍我国检察机关受理职务犯罪案件的范围,以及包括反渎职侵权部门在内的职务犯罪侦查部门的运行机制。第二节对实务中反渎职侵权部门履行法律监督职能侦查行政机关渎职侵权类案件时存在的普遍性问题进行了归纳式阐述。第三节就制约检察机关反渎职部门对行政机关进行法律监督存在问题的原因,包括宪法授权层面、反渎职侵权自身工作层面以及追究公务人员履职责任体系层面存在的问题成因进行了分析。第四节介绍我国香港地区廉政公署的机构设置、运行机制,特别是廉政公署在反腐倡廉查办案件中的一些特殊作法进行了比较,以期对我国内地职务犯罪侦查监督有一定借鉴和启示作用。第五节结合香港廉政公署的作法,对完善内地检察机关反渎职侵权部门对行政机关法律监督的路径进行了构想。具体分两个层面：其一是查办实务工作上的完善,即通过自身工作可以达到的目标；其二是对现行法律、制度设计上的完善,这需要国家立法机关进行全面统筹。
[Abstract]:The anti-malfeasance infringement department of the people's Procuratorate exercises its investigative power by investigating and handling cases of malfeasance infringement, thereby fulfilling the procuratorial organ's power of legal supervision, supervising and restricting the administrative and judicial powers, and strengthening legal supervision. To uphold the judicial objective of fairness and justice. If the public prosecution work of procuratorial organ is to purify the environment of comprehensive management of public security, then the investigation work of anti-malfeasance and tort department is to purify the environment of law enforcement of social government affairs. However, there are still many problems in the practice of implementing legal supervision over administrative organs, which restricts the full play of the function of legal supervision. Based on the analysis of the problems existing in the anti-malfeasance tort department and the basic reasons for restricting the anti-malfeasance tort work, this paper puts forward some suggestions. This paper is divided into five sections, the specific arrangements are as follows: The first section briefly introduces the scope of the procuratorial organ accepting duty crime cases and the operation mechanism of the duty crime investigation department including the anti-malfeasance tort department. The second section of the practice of anti-malfeasance tort department to perform the function of legal supervision to investigate the administrative organs malfeasance cases of common problems are summarized. The third section deals with the reasons for the problems in restricting the procuratorial organ's anti-malfeasance department from exercising legal supervision over the administrative organ, including the level of constitutional authorization. The causes of the problems in anti-malfeasance infringement and accountability system are analyzed. Section IV introduces the establishment and operation mechanism of the Independent Commission against Corruption (ICAC) in Hong Kong, especially the special practices of the ICAC in the investigation and handling of anti-corruption cases. In order to our country mainland duty crime investigation supervision has the certain reference and the enlightenment function. The fifth section, combined with the practice of Hong Kong Independent Commission against Corruption (ICAC), conceives the way to improve the legal supervision of the administrative organs by the mainland procuratorial organs' anti-malfeasance and tort departments. It can be divided into two levels: one is the perfection of the practical work, that is, the goal that can be achieved through its own work; the other is the perfection of the current law and system design, which requires the overall coordination of the national legislature.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】