当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

马克思主义理论指导下司法队伍专业化建设研究

发布时间:2018-06-14 21:24

  本文选题:马克思主义 + 司法队伍专业化 ; 参考:《曲阜师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:马克思主义是中国立党立国的根本指导思想,司法队伍专业化建设是在马克思、恩格斯、列宁等关于司法队伍建设的经典理论指导下,基于中国法制建设实际进行的,这是为历史所证明的无可争辩的事实。建国以来中国司法队伍专业化建设道路是曲折的,受具体革命实践影响巨大:这一方面导致司法队伍建设更多地致力于服务社会主义建设,受政治上奉行“以阶级斗争为纲”的影响,司法机关职能定位较多的强调专政属性,而忽略其司法职能,这从根本上导致推进司法队伍建设的一系列措施并不能够解决专业化问题;另一方面这也导致司法队伍建设过程中一直伴随着浓重的行政化色彩,重政治素养轻专业素养,进而导致司法队伍专业化建设推进缓慢。中国司法队伍专业化建设在马克思主义经典理论的指导下摸索前行,直到改革开放后才日趋成熟,渐入正轨并且稳步向前发展。整个司法队伍专业化建设过程在挫折与问题中步步前行,不断遇到新问题、不断解决新问题,司法队伍也日趋现代化。十八大以来,中国正处在整体转型升级的新的历史起点上,各领域处于全面深化改革的关键时期,在这一背景下,司法队伍专业化建设方面面临的问题也多是“难啃的硬骨头”。新时期习近平总书记关于法治国家的论述是对新中国成立以来党领导人民进行法治建设的经验总结,研究习近平总书记关于全面推进依法治国的思想对于创新法学理论,推动法治实践,攻克这些“硬骨头”,意义十分重大。习近平总书记在提高国家治理能力现代化、深化司法体制改革背景下提出要建设公正高效权威的社会主义司法制度,推进司法队伍专业化建设,创新法治人才培养机制,让司法人员能够尊重司法规律,服从法律。这既是马克思主义经典理论在中国司法队伍专业化建设中的进一步发展,也为推进解决当前中国司法队伍专业化过程中存在的问题与障碍指明了方向。基于这个思路,要在新时期继续完善司法队伍专业化建设,解决这些“硬骨头”,需要以马克思主义理论及其指导下司法队伍专业化建设的发展为主线。在此基础上,一方面要立足历史的维度,从根源上探究有关司法队伍专业化建设的理论与实践,并在此过程中探求理论与实践之间存在的偏差;另一方面要立足于现实的维度,探究长久以来司法队伍专业化建设过程中存在的内在问题与外在障碍,这有利于在新时期明确当前司法队伍专业化建设的制度性、基础性措施,并据此推动司法队伍专业建设的制度化,从而实现司法队伍专业化建设的常态化。司法队伍专业化建设,是全面深化司法体制改革的必要途径,对于保证司法公平正义、提高司法效率具有重要意义。法治中国背景下国家治理能力现代化是马克思主义理论中国化的最新成果,而司法队伍专业化建设是司法能力现代化的重要组成部分,因此探索马克思主义理论指导下的司法队伍专业化建设具有重要意义。
[Abstract]:Marx's doctrine is the fundamental guiding ideology of China's standing party in China. The professional construction of the judicial team is under the guidance of the classical theory of the construction of judicial ranks, such as Marx, Engels and Lenin, and is based on the construction of Chinese legal system. This is an indisputable fact for history. Since the founding of the people's Republic, the Chinese judicial team has been specialized. The construction road is tortuous and is greatly influenced by the concrete revolutionary practice: this leads to the construction of the judicial team more devoted to the service of socialist construction and the influence of "class struggle" in politics. The judicial organ has more emphasis on the dictatorship attribute and neglects its judicial function, which fundamentally leads to advance. A series of measures for the construction of the judicial team are not able to solve the problem of specialization; on the other hand, it has also led to a heavy administrative color in the process of the construction of the judicial team, with a heavy political accomplishment and a light professional accomplishment, which leads to the slow advancement of the specialized construction of the judicial team. The specialization of the Chinese judicial team is in the Marx doctrine. Under the guidance of the theory of the canonical theory, until the reform and opening up, it is becoming more and more mature, gradually coming into the right track and developing steadily. The whole process of professional construction of the judicial team is walking forward in setbacks and problems, constantly encountering new problems, solving new problems, and modernization of the judiciary. Since the eighteen major, China is in a whole transformation. In the new historical starting point of upgrading, various fields are in the key period of deepening the reform in an all-round way. In this context, the problems faced by the professional construction of the judicial team are mostly "hard bones". In the new period, the general secretary of Xi Jinping's discussion on the rule of law is the construction of the rule of law by the party leading the people since the founding of the new China. It is of great significance to study the general secretary of general Xi Jinping's Thoughts on promoting the rule of law in an all-round way to the theory of innovation of law, to promote the practice of the rule of law and to conquer these "hard bones". The general secretary of Xi Jinping, in the background of improving the modernization of national governance and deepening the reform of the judicial system, proposes to build a fair and efficient and authoritative society. The judicial system will promote the professional construction of the judicial team and innovate the training mechanism for the rule of law, so that the judicial personnel can respect the law of judicature and obey the law. This is the further development of the Marx doctrine theory in the professional construction of the Chinese judicial team, and it also exists in the process of promoting the professionalization of the current Chinese judicial team. Based on this idea, we should continue to improve the professional construction of the judicial team in the new period and solve these "hard bones". We need to develop the professional construction of the judicial team under the guidance of Marx doctrine and under the guidance of the theory. On the basis of this, we should base on the historical dimension and explore from the root. On the basis of the theory and practice of the professional construction of the judicial team, the deviation between theory and practice is explored in this process. On the other hand, the internal and external obstacles that exist in the course of the construction of the judicial team for a long time should be based on the reality dimension, which is beneficial to the specialization of the current judicial team in the new period. Construction of the system, basic measures, and accordingly to promote the institutionalization of the professional construction of the judicial team, so as to achieve the normalization of the professional construction of the judicial team. The professional construction of the judicial team is a necessary way to deepen the reform of the judicial system in an all-round way. It is of great significance to ensure judicial fairness and justice and improve the efficiency of the judicature. The modernization of national governance ability under the view is the latest achievement of the Sinicization of Marx's theory, and the specialization of the judicial team is an important part of the modernization of judicial ability. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the professional construction of the judicial team under the guidance of Marx theory.
【学位授予单位】:曲阜师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D926

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 白彦;;司法改革背景下我国法官员额制度问题研究[J];云南社会科学;2016年02期

2 沈广明;;上海司法改革背景下的法官遴选制度考察[J];延边党校学报;2015年05期

3 泮伟江;;司法改革、法治转型与国家治理能力的现代化[J];中共浙江省委党校学报;2015年05期

4 姚莉;;比较与启示:中国法官遴选制度的改革与优化[J];现代法学;2015年04期

5 王静;李学尧;夏志阳;;如何编制法官员额——基于民事案件工作量的分类与测量[J];法制与社会发展;2015年02期

6 刘建伟;;国家治理能力现代化研究述评[J];上海行政学院学报;2015年01期

7 郑成良;;专政的源流及其与法治国家的关系[J];交大法学;2014年04期

8 杨立新;;国家治理现代化与司法改革[J];法制与社会发展;2014年05期

9 付子堂;;改革司法考试制度,推进国家治理法治化现代化[J];法制与社会发展;2014年05期

10 程竹汝;;国家治理体系现代化进程中的司法治理[J];中共中央党校学报;2014年03期

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 张坤;;共解中加强优秀司法人才队伍建设[N];民主与法制时报;2016年

2 沈荣;;最高法院拓宽选人渠道优化队伍结构[N];人民法院报;2015年

3 左燕东;;选出最优秀的司法人员办案一线[N];山西日报;2015年

4 汤瑜;;商建刚:知名律师成为上海首位社会遴选法官[N];民主与法制时报;2015年

5 朱e,

本文编号:2019003


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2019003.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户41d6f***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com