司法裁判中的利益衡量及规制

发布时间：2018-06-16 22:33

本文选题：司法裁判 + 利益衡量　；参考：《河北大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着改革开放的不断深入，我国的社会利益格局也发生了深刻的变化，，如何调整利益的分配格局、协调利益间冲突、平衡利益关系，这已经成为司法裁判过程中面临的重要课题。利益衡量理论正成为我国学界普遍认可的能够解决这一难题的良方。利益衡量理论是在批判概念法学的基础上产生的，由利益法学派提出、经美国社会学法学的发展、日本的民法解释学将利益衡量理论发展到顶峰。现在，利益衡量已经成为普遍认可的法律方法。但经过充分发展的利益衡量理论在被引进至我国后面临着新的考验，利益衡量在司法裁判中的涵义以及定位问题在一定程度上限制了利益衡量作为法律方法在我国司法实践中的发挥，因而，首先要对利益衡量的中国内涵及定位进行明确。在司法实践中，利益衡量是指法官在司法裁判的过程中，对法律所确认的相互冲突的利益，进行权衡与取舍最终选择出需要保护的更重要的利益，并寻求相应的法律依据将结论予以正当化、合法化的活动。法官的裁判思维实质上就是利益思维，并且利益衡量可以称得上是司法裁判的实质方法。利益衡量贯穿司法裁判过程的始终，从查明案件、认定证据到得出结论和适用法律都离不开利益衡量。利益衡量在本质上讲是一种主观行为，更依赖于法官的主观能动性，因而具有自身固有的局限性和不足，如何通过可行的手段克制法官能动的“超范围”发挥，保证法律的稳定性和裁判结果的妥当性能够达到平衡，是利益衡量理论在司法裁判实践应用中面临的最大难题。本文在理论与实践的基础之上，探讨司法裁判中利益衡量的关键性问题并寻求规制利益衡量的对策。利益衡量的规制不是独立的一个问题，产生“恣意”或“滥用”的原因也不是仅仅因为利益衡量应用本身。利益衡量所处的裁判环境在更大意义上影响着利益衡量，因此本文所持的利益衡量规制观点是：利益衡量的规制本质上是要求完善利益衡量的应用，利益衡量应用的方法、原则等也正是利益衡量规制的原则和方法。另外提升法官的素质也是利益衡量规制的重要方面。本文分为三部分，着重讨论我国司法裁判中利益衡量的基本问题及其规制方案。第一部分梳理介绍利益衡量的基本概念和理论发展历程。第二部分是利益衡量在司法裁判中的基础理论，包括界定、定位及必要性问题，为后面的规制内容做理论铺垫。第三部分是本文的重点，分析了利益衡量在司法裁判中规制的缘由及进行规制的原则和方法。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening up, profound changes have taken place in the pattern of social interests in our country. How to adjust the distribution pattern of interests, coordinate the conflicts between interests and balance the relationship of interests has become an important subject in the process of judicial refereeing.
The theory of interest measurement is a good way to solve this problem. The theory of interest measurement is produced on the basis of critical concept jurisprudence. It is put forward by the school of interest law. After the development of American sociology of law, the theory of Civil Law Hermeneutics in Japan has developed the theory of balance of interest. It is a widely accepted legal method. But after being introduced into our country, the theory of fully developed interest measurement is faced with a new test. The meaning and positioning of the interest measurement in the judicial referee, to a certain extent, restricts the interest measurement as a legal method in our judicial practice. Therefore, the first should be to the balance of interests. The content and orientation of the volume of China are clearly defined.
In judicial practice, the measure of interest refers to the judge's judgment in the process of judicature, which is to justify and legitimize the legal basis, and the judge's thinking is in essence. Beneficial thinking and interest measurement can be regarded as the substantive method of judicial refereeing. Interest measurement runs through the process of judicial refereeing. It can not be separated from the determination of the case, the evidence to the conclusion and the applicable law.
The measure of interest is essentially a subjective act, more dependent on the subjective initiative of the judge, and therefore has its own inherent limitations and shortcomings. How to control the "super scope" of the judge through a feasible means to ensure that the stability of the law and the appropriate results of the referee can reach the balance, and the theory of interest measurement in the division. On the basis of theory and practice, this paper discusses the key problems of the interest measurement in the judicial referee and seeks the measures to regulate the measure of interest.
The regulation of interest measurement is not an independent problem. The cause of "unscrupulous" or "abuse" is not only because of the interest measurement application itself. The referee's environment in which the interests measure affects the interest measurement in a greater sense. Therefore, the view of the regulation of interest measurement is that the essence of the regulation of interest measurement is in essence. It is also the principle and method of interest measurement regulation to improve the application of interest measurement, the method and principle of interest measurement, and also to improve the quality of the judge as well as the important aspects of the regulation of interest measurement.
This article is divided into three parts, focusing on the basic problems of interest measurement in the judicial referee and its regulation scheme in our country. The first part combs the basic concept of interest measurement and the development course of the theory. The second part is the basic theory of the interest measurement in the judicial referee, including the definition, positioning and necessity, and the following regulation content. The third part is the focus of this article. It analyzes the reasons for the regulation of interest measurement in judicial adjudication and the principles and methods of regulation.
【学位授予单位】：河北大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】