“媒体审判”现象的分析与思考

发布时间：2018-06-18 09:44

本文选题：媒体审判 + 司法独立　；参考：《内蒙古大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：在法治的不断完善和发展的今天,司法也受到了人们越来越多的关注,民众需要司法公开的呼声也是愈演愈烈。在这种社会背景下,新闻媒体在监督司法、促进司法公正、披露司法腐败、培养公民法治观念等方面起到了无可替代的作用。而媒体也被民众寄予厚望,媒体监督在遏制司法腐败方面起到了至关重要的作用。虽然新闻媒体的首要任务便是客观公正,但是难免会受到利益的诱惑以及不同价值观念的影响。新闻媒体当然可以体现民意,但与此同时也很有可能误导民意。法院一旦处于这种被新闻媒体所误导的民意压力下,就有可能在强大的压力面前丧失审判的公正性和独立性。媒体监督是一把双刃剑,可以使案件走向公正和民主,但也可能促使案件的判决出现问题。媒体并非直接对法院产生压力,而是通过领导人和舆论对法院产生压力。而且,很多媒体在报道事件时已经有了鲜明的立场,往往分析问题也仅仅是站在一方当事人的立场上,这就很有可能会误导对事件真相不太了解的观众。法律是以事实为依据,讲求证据；而大众舆论多数则是对弱者过分同情,讲求道义,这样就会引起一种法不容情的假象,让广大民众产生了对法律的厌恶,以为法律太过残酷,忽视了人道。因此,媒体应该回归自身的一种特性,那就是尽量保持中立的立场去报道任何一个事件,不要预先对一件事情作出结论。虽然传媒对司法的监督有助于发现错案冤情,防止司法腐败,维护法官的操守。但是,这并不代表媒体可以无所限制地介入司法领域,甚至影响司法活动的独立开展。否则,传媒不但起不到促进司法公正、监督司法的目的,反而会因为过分干涉而使得司法公正遭到践踏。同样,这也不代表司法部门可以随意剥夺媒体的监督权,将正当的新闻采访拒之门外。
[Abstract]:With the continuous improvement and development of the rule of law, people pay more and more attention to the administration of justice. In this social background, the news media plays an irreplaceable role in supervising justice, promoting judicial justice, disclosing judicial corruption and cultivating citizens' concept of rule of law. The media is also highly expected of the public, media supervision has played a vital role in curbing judicial corruption. Although the primary task of news media is to be objective and impartial, it is inevitable to be influenced by interest and different values. The news media, of course, can reflect public opinion, but at the same time it is likely to mislead public opinion. Once the court is under the pressure of public opinion misled by the news media, it may lose the impartiality and independence of the trial in the face of strong pressure. Media supervision is a double-edged sword, which can make the case move towards justice and democracy, but it may also cause the judgment of the case to appear a problem. The media exert pressure on the court not directly, but through leaders and public opinion. Moreover, many media have already had a clear position in reporting the incident, often the analysis of the problem is only the position of one party, which is likely to mislead the audience who do not know the truth of the incident. The law is based on facts and emphasizes evidence; and the majority of public opinion is too sympathetic to the weak and moral. This will give rise to the false impression that the law is not in good taste, causing the general public to detest the law and think that the law is too cruel. Humanity is ignored. Therefore, the media should return to its own characteristic, that is, to maintain a neutral position to report any event, do not prejudge a matter. Although the media supervision of the judiciary helps to find wrongs, prevent judicial corruption, and uphold the integrity of judges. However, this does not mean that the media can intervene in the judicial field without restriction, or even affect the independent development of judicial activities. Otherwise, the media will not only fail to promote judicial justice and supervise justice, but will trample on judicial justice because of excessive interference. Nor does it mean that the judiciary can arbitrarily deprive the media of supervision and shut out legitimate news interviews.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】