论我国医疗纠纷ADR机制的合理构建

发布时间：2018-06-26 02:39

本文选题：医疗纠纷 + 医疗纠纷ADR机制　；参考：《南昌大学》2011年硕士论文

【摘要】：化解矛盾,促进对话,减少分歧,争取多赢是和谐社会的必然追求。在我国已引入医疗纠纷ADR机制的基础上如何去构建一个更合理、更高效的医疗纠纷ADR机制对于促进我国多元化的医疗纠纷解决机制、缓和日益恶化的医患关系、维护医患双方的合法权益、促进医学的发展、实现社会主义和谐有着极其重大的意义。论文分为引言、正文和结语三大部分。引言列举了2009年以来发生的四例典型案例,以此引出此文研究的必要性和研究的大体思路。正文分为三部分,第一部分主要阐述了医疗纠纷及其相关概念和问题、ADR机制、医疗纠纷的ADR机制等基本理论和部分国家和地区医疗纠纷ADR机制概况及对我国可作的有益借鉴等内容,提出我国医疗纠纷应该定义为“医患双方对医疗行为导致的后果、产生的原因认识不一致所引起的纷争”的观点。第二部分通过大量的数据材料介绍了2000—2010年我国部分地方医疗纠纷ADR解决的实践状况、我国医疗纠纷ADR机制的整体特征和现存的医疗纠纷ADR机制存在的局限性,提出了我国医疗纠纷ADR机制虽已初步建立但仍存在公平性不足、程序不规范、配套机制不健全、发展不平衡等诸多不足的观点。第三部分主要分析了我国医疗纠纷ADR机制构建的必要性与可行性,阐述了我国医疗纠纷ADR机制构建的价值取向和基本原则,提出了合理构建我国医疗纠纷协商解决机制、行政调解解决机制、中立第三人调解解决机制、仲裁解决机制、法院附设ADR机制的具体措施并倡导其他多元医疗纠纷ADR机制的尝试。结语对全文进行了总结,并对本文的特色和创新点进行了说明。
[Abstract]:Resolving contradictions, promoting dialogue, reducing differences and striving for multiple wins are the inevitable pursuit of a harmonious society. On the basis of the introduction of ADR mechanism in medical disputes in China, how to construct a more reasonable and efficient ADR mechanism to promote the diversification of medical dispute resolution mechanism and ease the deteriorating doctor-patient relationship. It is of great significance to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of both doctors and patients, to promote the development of medicine and to realize socialist harmony. The thesis is divided into three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The introduction enumerates four typical cases since 2009, which leads to the necessity of this study and the general idea of the study. The text is divided into three parts. The first part mainly expounds the medical dispute and its related concepts and ADR mechanism. The basic theories such as ADR mechanism of medical disputes, the general situation of ADR mechanism in some countries and regions and the useful reference to our country are put forward, and the medical disputes should be defined as the consequences of the medical behaviors of both doctors and patients. The cause of the conflict arises from the perception of the conflict caused by the inconsistency "point of view." The second part introduces the practice of ADR in parts of China from 2000 to 2010 through a large number of data, the overall characteristics of ADR mechanism of medical disputes and the limitations of the existing ADR mechanism of medical disputes. It is pointed out that although the ADR mechanism of medical disputes in China has been preliminarily established, there are still some shortcomings, such as lack of fairness, non-standard procedure, imperfect supporting mechanism, unbalanced development and so on. The third part mainly analyzes the necessity and feasibility of the construction of ADR mechanism of medical disputes in China, expounds the value orientation and basic principles of the construction of ADR mechanism of medical disputes in China, and puts forward the reasonable construction of negotiated settlement mechanism of medical disputes in China. Administrative mediation settlement mechanism, neutral third party mediation settlement mechanism, arbitration settlement mechanism, the specific measures of the court attached ADR mechanism and the attempt of advocating other multiple medical dispute ADR mechanism. The conclusion summarizes the full text, and explains the characteristics and innovation of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D922.16;D926

【相似文献】