人工智能介入司法领域的价值与定位

发布时间：2018-06-26 18:04

本文选题：人工智能 + 司法领域　；参考：《探索与争鸣》2017年10期

【摘要】：进入大数据人工智能时代,"数据法院、智慧法院"成为新一轮技术革命在法院落实的最好注脚。部分法院尝试开发了人工智能办案系统,在公检法共享办案平台上初步实现了证据标准和证据规则统一、单一证据合法性校验、证据链逻辑性判断和比对、类案推送、量刑参考和文书自动生成等方面的智能化。虽然人工智能具有防范冤假错案、提高司法效率、预防司法腐败的显著客观作用和价值,但对人工智能需有清醒认识,它不可能取代或代替法官办案。这源于人工智能本身作用的有限性,法官审判工作的系统性、职业性和经验性等因素,因而人工智能在法院的定位只能也必须是法官办案辅助工具。
[Abstract]:In the era of big data artificial intelligence, "data court, wisdom court" has become the best footnote of the new round of technological revolution in the court. Some courts have tried to develop the artificial intelligence case handling system, initially realized the unification of evidence standard and evidence rule on the common case handling platform of public security bureau, procuratorate and court, checked the legitimacy of single evidence, judged and compared the evidence chain logically, and pushed the case forward. Intelligent sentencing reference and automatic generation of documents. Although artificial intelligence has the remarkable objective function and value of preventing unjust false and wrong cases, improving judicial efficiency and preventing judicial corruption, it needs to have a clear understanding of artificial intelligence, and it can not replace or replace judges in handling cases. This originates from the limitation of the function of artificial intelligence itself, the systematic, professional and experiential factors of the judge's trial work, and so on. Therefore, the positioning of artificial intelligence in the court can only and must be an auxiliary tool for the judge to handle a case.
【作者单位】：华东政法大学;上海市高级人民法院;
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】