论我国法院附设调解制度的构建
发布时间:2018-06-27 03:45
本文选题:法院附设调解 + 司法ADR ; 参考:《广东商学院》2011年硕士论文
【摘要】:二十世纪末,人类社会发生着翻天覆地的变化,伴随着变化而来的是纠纷的大量涌现。民事诉讼在解决纠纷方面越发显得力不从心。一种新兴的纠纷解决机制映入人们眼帘。这就是ADR。法院附设调解作为ADR的重要表现形式之一,最近几十年来受到了密切的关注。国内多数学者未将其纳入诉讼外纠纷解决机制内,而是将其纳入诉讼领域进行研讨,对制度的建构部分论述得也相对简单。实践中,不少法院开始尝试建立新型的法院调解制度。但由于缺乏法律的规定,导致在改革过程中方式各异。 基于此,本文研究并提出在我国构建法院附设调解制度的理论基础和具体设想,以期对理论研究与司法实践有积极的意义。本文共分为四个部分: 第一章是对法院附设调解的基本原理研究。内容涉及法院附设调解的概念、特征,性质,理论基础以及与其他调解制度的比较。 第二章论述我国构建法院附设调解制度的必要性和可行性分析。在必要性分析方面,提出诉讼固有的局限性与国情对纠纷解决的制约的问题,并对我国现阶段法院调解制度的立法现状和实践状况分别进行考察,指出各自存在的缺陷。在可行性研究方面,主要从三个方面展开,第一是法院司法政策的转变,第二是理论研究的基础;最后是各地法院对诉讼调解改革的试点及其经验。 第三章对域外法院附设调解制度进行考察,寻求对我国构建法院附设调解制度的借鉴意义。 第四章论述构建法院附设调解的具体构想。本章从三大方面提出完善的建议。首先涉及法院附设调解制度的立法,其次是法院附设调解制度的主体措施,最后是提出法院附设调解的配套保障措施。
[Abstract]:At the end of 20 ~ (th) century, the human society has undergone tremendous changes, accompanied by the emergence of a large number of disputes. Civil litigation has become increasingly inadequate in resolving disputes. A new kind of dispute resolution mechanism came into people's eyes. This is ADR. As one of the important manifestations of ADR, court-attached mediation has received close attention in recent decades. Most domestic scholars do not bring it into the dispute settlement mechanism outside litigation, but they study it in the field of litigation, and the construction of the system is relatively simple. In practice, many courts began to try to establish a new court mediation system. However, due to the lack of legal provisions, resulting in different ways in the reform process. Based on this, this paper studies and puts forward the theoretical basis and concrete idea of constructing the mediation system attached to the court in our country, which is expected to have positive significance for theoretical research and judicial practice. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter is about the basic principle of court-attached mediation. The content involves the concept, characteristics, nature, theoretical basis and comparison with other mediation systems. The second chapter discusses the necessity and feasibility of constructing the court-attached mediation system in China. In the aspect of necessity analysis, the author puts forward the inherent limitation of litigation and the restriction of national conditions on dispute resolution, and investigates the present legislation and practice of the court mediation system in China, and points out their defects. In the aspect of feasibility study, it is mainly carried out from three aspects: the first is the transformation of the court's judicial policy, the second is the basis of the theoretical research, and the last is the trial and experience of the courts' reform of litigation mediation. The third chapter investigates the mediation system attached to foreign courts and seeks for reference to the construction of court-attached mediation system in China. Chapter four discusses the concrete conception of constructing court-attached mediation. This chapter puts forward some suggestions from three aspects. First, it involves the legislation of the court-attached mediation system, secondly, the main measures of the court-attached mediation system, and finally, it puts forward the supporting safeguard measures of court-attached mediation.
【学位授予单位】:广东商学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D926.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 朱林兵;;试论我国刑事辩护制度的理论基础[J];湖北社会科学;2008年04期
2 蔡从燕;英国民事司法改革架构中的ADR及其借鉴意义[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2003年02期
3 王锐;;澳大利亚联邦法院对调解服务的监督和评估[J];法律适用;2008年10期
4 章武生,张大海;论德国的起诉前强制调解制度[J];法商研究;2004年06期
5 毛淑玲;;法院调解与法院附设调解[J];法学杂志;2008年04期
6 李子煊;;对我国检察机关参与公益诉讼的思索[J];淮南师范学院学报;2006年04期
7 陈琦华;;适用法院附设ADR制度处理相邻权纠纷研究[J];安徽警官职业学院学报;2007年02期
8 闫庆霞;;中日诉讼外调解制度比较[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年04期
9 毛兴平;刘艳芳;;法院附设调解制度与法院调解制度之比较[J];黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报;2007年02期
10 孙永军;;法院调解改革新论[J];前沿;2006年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 洪冬英;当代中国调解制度的变迁研究[D];华东政法大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 卫玲丹;家事调解程序研究[D];太原科技大学;2009年
,本文编号:2072540
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2072540.html