我国刑事指导案例的确立

发布时间：2018-06-27 11:27

本文选题：刑事 + 指导案例　；参考：《西南大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：在我国大陆刑事司法实务中,基于刑事成文法的固有特点和弱点,刑法规范具有模糊性、多解性,也存在空白区域,规范与事实之间并不完全、清楚、准确且逐一地相互对应,刑法规范与具体案件的事实认定和法律适用之间存在差异、冲突、无据和多选等情形,致使案件难以裁判或裁判不准,刑事司法活动低效或无效。通过吸取判例法的经验,建立案例指导制度,在一定程度上解决刑事成文规范在个案中具体适用的难题,成为我国大陆刑事司法改革中的一项重要内容。近年来,最高人民法院积极建设和推行案例指导制度,对指导案例的选择标准、确定程序、发布方式等都作出了规定。但是,关于刑事指导案例的确立、运用等理论和实务问题并没有得到深入讨论。本文主要就刑事指导案例的确立进行论证,使刑事指导案例的形成和确定过程符合案例指导制度构建的初衷。本文以刑事指导案例确立原则为起点论述,将刑事指导案例确立程序与其他刑事法律规则制定程序进行了界分,从而对刑事指导案例确立程序进行定位。在此基础之上,对刑事指导案例确立的主体、标准、体例、程序等具体环节进行了分析。将确立方式分为内部选择方式与外部选择方式两种方式,并对两种选择方式的优缺点进行了比较,旨在把两种方式贯穿于几个具体环节之中,进而论证我国刑事指导案例的具体确立路径。最后,对影响刑事指导案例确立的几方面因素进行探讨,提出了相关的确立保障措施。
[Abstract]:In the practice of criminal justice in mainland China, based on the inherent characteristics and weaknesses of criminal statute law, criminal law norms are fuzzy, multi-resolution, there are also blank areas, norms and facts are not complete, clear, accurate and one by one corresponding to each other. There are differences between the criminal law norms and the fact determination and application of the law in specific cases, such as conflict, unsubstantiated and multi-selection, which result in the cases being difficult to judge or not correct, and the criminal judicial activities are inefficient or invalid. By drawing on the experience of case law and establishing the case guidance system, it is an important content in the criminal judicial reform of mainland China to solve the problem of the concrete application of the criminal written norms in the case to a certain extent. In recent years, the Supreme people's Court has actively constructed and implemented the case guidance system, and has made provisions on the selection criteria, the determination of procedures, and the way of issuing the guiding cases. However, the establishment and application of criminal guidance cases and other theoretical and practical issues have not been discussed in depth. This paper mainly demonstrates the establishment of criminal guidance cases, so that the formation and determination of criminal guidance cases accord with the original intention of case guidance system construction. Taking the principle of establishing criminal guidance case as the starting point, this paper divides the procedure of establishing criminal guidance case from that of other rules of criminal law, thus positioning the procedure of establishing criminal guidance case. On this basis, the main body, standard, style and procedure of criminal guidance case are analyzed. The established mode is divided into internal and external selection, and the advantages and disadvantages of the two choices are compared in order to run through the two ways in several specific links. And then prove the concrete establishment path of our country criminal guidance case. Finally, several factors affecting the establishment of criminal guidance cases are discussed, and relevant measures are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：西南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D924;D926

【参考文献】