转型期中国司法改革职业化的理据

发布时间：2018-06-28 10:44

本文选题：司法职业化 + 理论和历史依据　；参考：《陕西师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：一个国家法治建设的深入,必然伴随着司法改革的不断探索。改革开放以来我国进入了社会转型期,高速发展和高度风险并存,利益多元和矛盾多发并存,是否继续坚持司法改革职业化的方向引发了理论界、实践界的探讨。本文拟从司法职业化的界定入手,分析司法职业化的理论和历史依据,并借鉴有关国家司法职业制度的经验,立足我国转型期的社会现实和基本国情,探讨和研究转型期中国司法职业化的理据,以期为司法改革职业化的深入提供理论支撑。本文的内容包括绪论、正文和结论在内,共分为六章。第一章为“绪论”。首先,介绍了本文的研究背景、选题的理论意义和现实意义；其次,对国内外相关论题的研究现状进行梳理；最后,对论文中用到的主要研究方法进行了介绍,另外也指出本文的创新点,并认识到论证的不足之处。第二章“司法职业化的界定”。对职业化、法律职业化、司法职业化进行了分析,并讨论了“司法职业化”与“司法专业化”、“司法精英化”等相关概念的关系。第三章“司法职业化的理论和历史依据”。首先,研究了司法职业化的理论史据,从分权学说和职业主义两个理论入手,分析司法职业化在法学理论史上的依据；第二,从司法权的本原引出司法的价值,通过逻辑分析得出司法独立、司法公正和司法效率——作为司法权与生俱来的价值——都需要司法职业化；第三,按照历史演进的顺序,考察司法职业化的产生和发展脉络。第四章“有关国家司法职业制度的经验借鉴”。通过对英国、美国、德国和日本四国的司法职业制度进行评析,得出其共性是职业化程度较高,在司法过程中民意参与需要严格规制等,总结了我国的可借鉴之处。第五章“转型期中国司法职业化的现实基础和需要”。首先,梳理了我国转型期司法职业化的历史进程,对转型期进行了界定并回顾了转型期中国司法改革职业化的历史进程；其次,结合转型期中国社会的特点,分析了对司法改革所处的时代环境；最后,指出转型期中国司法改革需要坚持职业化道路,从目前司法实践中面临的一些问题入手,分析其与民主化的可通约性。第六章为“结论”。对全文进行总结,指出转型期中国需要坚持司法改革职业化取向,对职业化与司法神秘感、司法民主的矛盾进行分析解决。
[Abstract]:The construction of a country's rule of law must be accompanied by the constant exploration of judicial reform. Since the reform and opening to the outside world, our country has entered a period of social transformation, with the coexistence of high speed development and high risk, multiple interests and multiple contradictions. Whether we should continue to adhere to the direction of professionalization of judicial reform has led to the discussion of the theoretical and practical circles. This paper begins with the definition of judicial professionalization, analyzes the theoretical and historical basis of judicial professionalization, and draws lessons from the experience of the national judicial professional system, and bases itself on the social reality and basic national conditions in the transition period of our country. In order to provide theoretical support for the professionalization of judicial reform, this paper probes into the motivation of judicial professionalization in China during the transition period. The content of this paper includes introduction, text and conclusion, which is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is introduction. First of all, it introduces the research background, the theoretical and practical significance of the topic; secondly, the research status of related topics at home and abroad are combed; finally, the main research methods used in the paper are introduced. In addition, it also points out the innovation of this paper, and recognizes the shortcomings of the argumentation. The second chapter is the definition of judicial professionalization. This paper analyzes the professionalization, the professionalization of the law and the professionalization of the judicature, and discusses the relationship among the concepts of "professionalization of the judiciary", "judicial specialization", "judicial excellence" and so on. The third chapter is the theory and historical basis of judicial professionalization. First of all, it studies the theoretical history of judicial professionalization, analyzes the basis of judicial professionalization in the history of legal theory from the theory of separation of powers and the theory of professionalism; second, it leads to the value of justice from the origin of judicial power. Through logical analysis, it is concluded that judicial independence, judicial justice and judicial efficiency, as the inherent value of judicial power, all need judicial professionalization. Thirdly, according to the order of historical evolution, the emergence and development of judicial professionalization are investigated. The fourth chapter is about the experience of the national judicial professional system. Through the analysis of the judicial professional systems of Britain, the United States, Germany and Japan, it is concluded that the commonness of the system is the high degree of professionalization, and the participation of public opinion in the judicial process needs strict regulation, and summarizes the points that our country can use for reference. The fifth chapter is the realistic foundation and need of judicial professionalization in China during the transition period. First of all, it combs the historical process of judicial professionalization in the transitional period of our country, defines the transition period and reviews the historical process of the professionalization of judicial reform in China in the transitional period; secondly, it combines the characteristics of the Chinese society in the transition period. Finally, the author points out that China's judicial reform needs to adhere to the road of professionalization in the transitional period, starting with some problems in the current judicial practice, and analyzes its compatibility with democratization. The sixth chapter is the conclusion. This paper summarizes the full text and points out that China should adhere to the orientation of professionalization of judicial reform and analyze and resolve the contradictions between professionalization and judicial mystery and judicial democracy.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】