论李庄案的法治意义
发布时间:2018-06-29 20:17
本文选题:李庄案 + 法治 ; 参考:《中央财经大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:2009年末,正值重庆“打黑除恶”行动进行之时,原北京康达律师事务所律师李庄涉嫌触犯辩护人伪造证据、妨害作证罪一案,成为我国法学理论界和司法实务界,,乃至全社会关注的热点。2010年2月,重庆市第一中级人民法院二审判决李庄构成辩护人伪造证据、妨害作证罪,判处有期徒刑一年六个月。媒体、公众和学界将此一时期的李庄案称为“李庄第一季”。2011年4月,李庄在重庆服刑期间因同一罪名再次被提起公诉,经法院审理后检方撤回起诉。此一时期的李庄案也被称为“李庄第二季”。李庄出狱后,于2011年12月向原审法院提出申诉,拉开了“李庄第三季”的帷幕。截至论文完成之际,“李庄第三季”尚无结果。但毫无疑问的是,由上述一系列事件所组成的李庄案是近几年我国法律界关注的焦点,也被公认为我国法治进程中的标志性案件。 今天,李庄案的风波尚未平息,但该案中的公安机关违法办案、审判程序存在瑕疵、司法受到干预等现象,皆可折射出我国法治环境令人忧虑的现状、法律及相关司法制度的不完善。在充分认识上述问题的基础上,论文以李庄案为素材,对该案的案情和涉及的法律问题进行了全面梳理和思考,将李庄案上升到国家法治层面进行了研究。通过对此案的研究,揭示了法治对于今日中国的重要意义。 论文共有五章:第一章概述了李庄案的来龙去脉、法律界对该案的基本认识及笔者自己的理解。第二章以李庄案为视角,分析了律师伪证罪存在的问题,并提出了立法上的修改建议。第三章通过分析由李庄案折射出的我国律师在执业当中遇到的困难,探讨了我国律师制度的不足之处以及如何使其更加完善。第四章以李庄案为例,剖析了我国刑事诉讼制度存在的缺陷和2012年《刑事诉讼法》修改的部分内容,并探讨了我国刑事诉讼制度的发展方向。第五章讨论了李庄案和中国法治建设的关系,重点阐述了律师对我国法治建设的作用和司法改革的方向。
[Abstract]:At the end of 2009, at the time of Chongqing's "cracking down on criminal elements and eliminating evil", Li Zhuang, a lawyer of the former Beijing Kangda Law firm, was suspected of committing the crime of forgery of evidence and obstruction of testimony by defenders, thus becoming the legal theorists and judicial practitioners in our country. In February 2010, Chongqing No. 1 Intermediate people's Court sentenced Li Zhuang to forgery of evidence and obstruction of testimony, and sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months. The media, the public and academics called the Li Zhuang case of this period "Li Zhuang season 1." in April 2011, Li Zhuang was prosecuted again for the same offence while serving his sentence in Chongqing, and the prosecution withdrew the indictment after a court hearing. The Li Zhuang case during this period is also known as Li Zhuang season 2. Li Zhuang filed a complaint with the trial court in December 2011, opening the third season of Li Zhuang. At the time of completion of the paper, Li Zhuang season 3 had no results. But there is no doubt that the Li Zhuang case composed of the above mentioned events is the focus of our country's legal circles in recent years, and it is also recognized as the iconic case in the process of our country's rule of law. Today, the storm in the Li Zhuang case has not subsided, but the public security organs in the case have handled cases illegally, the trial procedures have been flawed, the judicial system has been interfered, and so on, all of which can reflect the worrying present situation of the legal environment in our country. The imperfections of the law and related judicial system. On the basis of fully understanding the above problems, the paper takes the Li Zhuang case as the material, the case of the case and the legal issues involved in a comprehensive combing and thinking, the Li Zhuang case rose to the level of the rule of law. Through the study of this case, it reveals the significance of the rule of law to China today. There are five chapters: the first chapter summarizes the origin of the Li Zhuang case, the basic understanding of the legal profession and the author's own understanding. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the problems of perjury from the perspective of Li Zhuang case, and puts forward some legislative suggestions. The third chapter analyzes the difficulties of Chinese lawyers in practice reflected by Li Zhuang case, and discusses the shortcomings of our lawyer system and how to make it more perfect. The fourth chapter takes the case of Li Zhuang as an example, analyzes the defects of the criminal procedure system in China and some contents of the revision of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, and probes into the developing direction of the criminal procedure system in our country. The fifth chapter discusses the relationship between the Li Zhuang case and the construction of the rule of law in China, focusing on the role of lawyers in the construction of the rule of law in China and the direction of judicial reform.
【学位授予单位】:中央财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D920.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王德志;以保障法官独立为核心推进司法改革[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1999年01期
2 卞建林;;改革开放30年中国刑事诉讼制度发展之回顾与展望[J];法学杂志;2009年01期
3 "检察过程中律师权利保障问题研究"课题组;张兆凯;陈忠;冷必元;刘记福;;律师伪证罪应当存而慎用[J];法学杂志;2009年03期
4 张卫兵;论我国《刑法》第306条、307条的立法完善[J];法学评论;2003年05期
5 张德淼,周佑勇;论当前我国实现司法正义的条件和途径[J];法学评论;1999年01期
6 戚渊;司法如何公正——一种尊重常识的论述[J];法学;1999年12期
7 龙宗智;;李庄案法理研判——主要从证据学的角度[J];法学;2010年02期
8 李扬;刘湖平;;浅析《刑法》第306条之立法缺陷[J];法制与社会;2009年09期
9 任莎莎;;浅析《刑法》第306条的不足与完善[J];法制与社会;2010年21期
10 张玉镶;门金玲;;刑法第306条的理性解读[J];河北法学;2007年02期
本文编号:2083253
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2083253.html