“第三方裁判被收买”对司法公正的影响

发布时间：2018-06-29 23:55

本文选题：第三方裁判 + 司法公正　；参考：《学术月刊》2015年11期

【摘要】："司法是公平正义的最后一道防线",其作为第三方裁判能够依照公平正义解决纠纷,从而保障和提升社会合作。西方学术界近年来引入实验研究的新范式和视角,初步证明第三方裁判能够惩罚不公平的自利者,提升合作和分配公平。但是,此类实验忽略双方当事人都可能有动力去收买裁判者,也轻视司法裁判者的自利倾向。基于社会与司法的现实,我们设计了行为实验以研究不公正的司法裁判,研究假设司法能够被收买乃至于主动索贿,考察其在此类情况下对合作和道德的影响,以及民众对司法公信力的态度。研究发现收买会引发行为道德性与合作下降,并导致司法公信力下降;但同时也发现了部分人的利他行为,以及多数人的两面性。
[Abstract]:"Justice is the last line of defense of fairness and justice". As a third party judge, it can solve disputes according to fairness and justice, thus ensuring and promoting social cooperation. In recent years, the western academic circles have introduced a new paradigm and perspective of experimental research, which preliminarily proves that third party referees can punish unfair self-interested persons and promote cooperation and distributive fairness. However, such experiments ignore that both parties may have the incentive to buy off the referee and despise the self-interest tendency of the judicial referee. Based on the reality of society and justice, we have designed behavioral experiments to study unfair justice, hypothesized that justice can be bought and even actively solicited, and examine its impact on cooperation and ethics in such situations. And the public's attitude towards judicial credibility. The study found that buying would lead to the decline of behavior morality and cooperation, and the decline of judicial credibility, but also found that some people's altruistic behavior, as well as the majority of the two sides.
【作者单位】：厦门大学法学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(14YJC820055) 厦门大学“中央高校基本科研业务费”项目(T2013221004)“司法公正之行为实验研究”、厦门大学“文科繁荣计划”子项目“法律与社会认知神经科学研究”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926

【共引文献】