检察机关的宪法定位与检察权的配置

发布时间：2018-06-30 00:29

本文选题：检察机关 + 宪法定位　；参考：《江西社会科学》2012年05期

【摘要】：近年来,国内外有关检察权的理论研究成果颇丰,不少研究成果提出了有价值的意见和建议,但就我国检察权的性质而言,截至目前,学术界和实务界对检察权的性质还远未达成共识。从法律文本来看,导致检察权产生争议的原因主要是检察机关的宪法定位与宪政地位之间的差异所致。检察机关的宪法定位是一国检察制度的逻辑起点;检察权的性质决定了该国检察制度的根本价值取向。研究检察权配置问题,必须在坚持人民代表大会制度前提下进行:既要关注权力制约与监督的理论逻辑和制度逻辑,也要关注权力需要合作及有所作为的社会现实。只有如此才能科学而理性地配置与构建具有中国特色的检察制度和检察权运行机制。
[Abstract]:In recent years, there have been a lot of theoretical research on procuratorial power at home and abroad, many of which have put forward valuable opinions and suggestions. However, as far as the nature of procuratorial power is concerned in our country, up to now, The nature of procuratorial power is far from reached in academic and practical circles. From the point of view of legal texts, the main reason for the controversy of procuratorial power is the difference between the constitutional orientation and constitutional status of procuratorial organs. The constitutional orientation of procuratorial organs is the logical starting point of a country's procuratorial system, and the nature of procuratorial power determines the fundamental value orientation of the procuratorial system in that country. To study the allocation of procuratorial power, we must carry out it on the premise of insisting on the system of people's Congress: we should not only pay attention to the theoretical logic and institutional logic of power restriction and supervision, but also pay attention to the social reality that power needs cooperation and something to do. Only in this way can we scientifically and rationally configure and construct the procuratorial system and procuratorial power operation mechanism with Chinese characteristics.
【作者单位】：郑州大学法学院;河南社会科学编辑部;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“宪法学视野下行政权的检察监督”(项目批准号:11BFX087)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D926.3

【参考文献】