我国检察权的思考与完善
发布时间:2018-07-02 15:01
本文选题:检察权 + 检察制度 ; 参考:《华东政法大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:任何一种制度都有一个不断完善的过程,也没有任何一种制度能够一直处于完美的状态,制度总是随着社会变动不断变化,只有同时适应了理论与实践的制度才是能够长期合理存在的制度。本文围绕我国检察权是法律监督权这一法律事实,比较研究外国检察权的内容,结合我国法律文化和国家制度,分析我国法律监督权形成的原因、存在的问题,提出一些完善检察制度的建议,为我国司法制度改革提供参考。 第一章首先从检察机关与其他权力机关如警察机关、法院的关系分析英美法国家检察权的具体内容,也就是对各国检察权与侦查权、审判权之间的关系进行探讨。同时对我国检察制度的起源、发展做简要概述。同时依照现行法律规定,阐述我国检察权的具体监督职能,包括立案监督、侦查监督、审判监督、刑罚执行监督、民事、行政监督五个方面,并提出在目前司法实践中,法律监督权遇到的障碍和存在的问题。 第二章首先根据检察职能的内容界定英美法三国检察权的性质,总结比较三权分立模式和一元权力模式下检察权的制约监督功能。结合我国人文意识形态、法律传统、现行司法制度等分析我国检察权之所以为法律监督权的原因。 第三章借鉴外国检察制度设置,结合我国司法实践中遇到的问题,提出检察制度改革的一些建议。包括如何依法独立行使检察权、如何理顺警检关系、审判监督的改革措施、民事、行政案件监督的改革措施、由检察机关提起公益诉讼等。
[Abstract]:Any system has a continuous process of perfection, and no system can always be in a perfect state. The system always changes with social changes. Only the system that adapts to both theory and practice is a system that can exist reasonably for a long time. Based on the fact that the procuratorial power is the right of legal supervision, this paper compares and studies the contents of the foreign procuratorial power, analyzes the causes and problems of the formation of the power of legal supervision in our country, in combination with the legal culture and national system of our country. Some suggestions on how to perfect the procuratorial system are put forward to provide reference for the reform of our judicial system. The first chapter analyzes the specific contents of procuratorial power in Anglo-American law countries from the relationship between procuratorial organs and other power organs such as the police and the courts, that is, the relationship between procuratorial powers, investigation powers and adjudication powers in various countries. At the same time, the origin and development of China's procuratorial system are briefly summarized. At the same time, according to the current laws and regulations, this paper expounds the specific supervisory functions of the procuratorial power in our country, including the supervision of filing the case, the supervision of investigation, the supervision of trial, the supervision of execution of punishment, the supervision of civil affairs and the supervision of administration, and puts forward that in the current judicial practice, The obstacles and problems of the legal supervision power. The second chapter firstly defines the nature of procuratorial power in Anglo-American and French countries according to the content of procuratorial function, and summarizes and compares the restricting and supervising functions of procuratorial power under the mode of separation of three powers and the mode of monistic power. This paper analyzes the reasons why the procuratorial power of our country is the power of legal supervision combined with the humanistic ideology, the legal tradition, the current judicial system and so on. The third chapter draws lessons from the foreign procuratorial system, and puts forward some suggestions on the reform of the procuratorial system in combination with the problems encountered in the judicial practice of our country. It includes how to exercise procuratorial power independently according to law, how to straighten out the relationship between police and procurators, how to reform measures of trial supervision, how to supervise civil and administrative cases, and how to bring public interest litigation by procuratorial organs.
【学位授予单位】:华东政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 蒋伟亮;;国家权力结构中的检察监督权:理念与制度[J];法学杂志;2007年04期
2 龙宗智;论检察权的性质与检察机关的改革[J];法学;1999年10期
3 谢鹏程;论检察权的性质[J];法学;2000年02期
4 周永坤;;权力结构模式与宪政[J];中国法学;2005年06期
5 朱孝清;;中国检察制度的几个问题[J];中国法学;2007年02期
6 龙宗智;论依法独立行使检察权[J];中国刑事法杂志;2002年01期
,本文编号:2090500
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2090500.html