“案结事了”:人民法院司法公信力的验算与实践

发布时间：2018-07-04 15:21

本文选题：“案结事了” + 调解优先　；参考：《河北法学》2013年02期

【摘要】："案结事了"与人民法院司法公信力关系紧密,互为因果。自从最高人民法院提出把"案结事了"作为审判工作追求的目标以来,全国各级法院积极响应,通过各种途径努力实现"案结事了"。但是,人民法院在努力实现"案结事了"过程中,无论是司法说服力的弱化、不信任司法的非理性泛化,还是司法路径的偏颇,均影响司法公信力的树立,从而阻碍了"案结事了"目标的实现。要努力实现"案结事了",惟有从提高司法公信力着手,同时走主动认同和强制认同两条道路。人民法院既要充分发挥调解柔性化解矛盾纠纷的作用,又要注重法的指引、评价、预测甚至教育等功能的发挥,在确保司法公开、公正之基础上建立司法权威,通过司法引导、确立社会规则之治。
[Abstract]:The conclusion of the case is closely related to the judicial credibility of the people's court. Since the Supreme people's Court put forward "closing the case" as the goal of the trial work, the courts at all levels in the country have responded positively and made great efforts to realize the conclusion of the case through various ways. However, in the process of realizing the conclusion of the case, whether it is the weakening of judicial persuasion, the irrational generalization of distrust of judicature or the bias of judicial path, the people's court affects the establishment of judicial credibility. Therefore, it hinders the realization of the goal of "closing the case". In order to realize the conclusion of the case, we can only improve the judicial credibility and take the two ways of active identification and compulsory identification. The people's courts should not only give full play to the role of mediation and flexibility in resolving contradictions and disputes, but also pay attention to the guidance, evaluation, prediction and even education of the law, so as to establish judicial authority on the basis of ensuring judicial openness and impartiality, and establish judicial authority through judicial guidance. Establish the rule of social rules.
【作者单位】：重庆工商大学法学院;重庆市第三中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D926.2

【相似文献】