我国网络司法拍卖制度及其完善
发布时间：2018-07-13 19:31
【摘要】：随着互联网技术的逐渐成熟和网络交易的普及,网络司法拍卖因其具有成本低、效率高等特点而进入人们的视野。在实践中形成了以上海、重庆、浙江为代表的三种模式。目前我国网络司法拍卖制度主要包括人民法院、网络平台的法律定位及责任承担、拍卖程序、权利人的救济途径等内容,但在实践中还存在沉淀资金所有权及孳息归属不明、救济权配置存在缺陷、评估和监督机制不完善等问题。针对上述存在的问题,结合我国网络司法拍卖制度的现状,提出如下的完善建议:第一,明确规定沉淀资金及其孳息应该归属于竞拍者,但在返还孳息的做法上可以采取变通的方式。第二,完善救济权配置。案外人财产被错误拍卖时,赋予其享有拍卖价金的返还请求权。拍定人所拍标的物存在权利瑕疵,法院通过“公示公告”和“声明不保证”主张免责时,应当分情况区别对待。第三,拍卖成交确认书既不是合同的生效要件,也不是所有权转移的依据,应当予以摒弃,以拍卖裁定书来统一其效力。第四,在评估费的收取方式上,引入错误边际的概念。在监督方式上,从人民法院内部的分权与制衡、人民法院对网络平台的监督、人民检察院的事后监督来进行完善。
[Abstract]:With the gradual maturity of Internet technology and the popularization of network transactions, the network judicial auction has entered people's vision because of its low cost and high efficiency. In practice, the three models represented by Shanghai, Chongqing and Zhejiang are formed. At present, the network judicial auction system in China mainly includes the people's court and the legal system of the network platform. However, in practice, there are some problems in the practice, such as the ownership of the capital and the remedies, the defects in the allocation of remedies and the imperfect supervision mechanism. In view of the problems mentioned above, the following perfect construction is put forward in combination with the current situation of the system of network judicial auction in China. First, it is clear that the precipitated funds and their fruits should belong to the bidders, but the way of returning the fruits can be adopted. Second, improve the allocation of the right of relief. When the property of the case is wrongly auctioned, the right to return the auction price is given. Public notice "and" Declaration do not guarantee "should be treated differently when they advocate exemption. Third, the confirmation of an auction transaction is neither an effective element of the contract nor a basis for the transfer of ownership. It should be abandoned and the validity of an auction ruling is unify. Fourth, the concept of the error margin is introduced in the manner of collecting the evaluation fee. In the way of supervision, the people's court's supervision of the network platform and the post supervision of the people's Procuratorate are perfected from the decentralization and checks and balances within the people's court.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2
[Abstract]:With the gradual maturity of Internet technology and the popularization of network transactions, the network judicial auction has entered people's vision because of its low cost and high efficiency. In practice, the three models represented by Shanghai, Chongqing and Zhejiang are formed. At present, the network judicial auction system in China mainly includes the people's court and the legal system of the network platform. However, in practice, there are some problems in the practice, such as the ownership of the capital and the remedies, the defects in the allocation of remedies and the imperfect supervision mechanism. In view of the problems mentioned above, the following perfect construction is put forward in combination with the current situation of the system of network judicial auction in China. First, it is clear that the precipitated funds and their fruits should belong to the bidders, but the way of returning the fruits can be adopted. Second, improve the allocation of the right of relief. When the property of the case is wrongly auctioned, the right to return the auction price is given. Public notice "and" Declaration do not guarantee "should be treated differently when they advocate exemption. Third, the confirmation of an auction transaction is neither an effective element of the contract nor a basis for the transfer of ownership. It should be abandoned and the validity of an auction ruling is unify. Fourth, the concept of the error margin is introduced in the manner of collecting the evaluation fee. In the way of supervision, the people's court's supervision of the network platform and the post supervision of the people's Procuratorate are perfected from the decentralization and checks and balances within the people's court.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.2
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李琳;;购买司法拍卖物业的风险及对策[J];上海房地;2011年04期
2 丁军;;网络司法拍卖相关法律问题探讨[J];东方企业文化;2013年15期
3 徐舟;;推行司法网拍 提升司法公信——从法的价值角度证成网络司法拍卖合理性[J];法制与社会;2013年28期
4 乔晓;;重庆:司法拍卖进入产权市场[J];产权导刊;2009年04期
5 朱薇;;重庆力破司法拍卖暴利链[J];w，
本文编号：2120507
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2120507.html
