媒体监督与司法审判：从个案分析看二者的冲突与调和

发布时间：2018-08-05 17:41

【摘要】：媒体监督与司法审判是现代法治社会不可或缺的组成部分，也是实现社会公平正义的重要途径和保障。随着中国社会的发展、公民权利意识的增强以及舆论环境的日趋宽松，我国媒体监督司法的主动性和积极性大为提高，二者的冲突也日益增多。在媒体与司法冲突频发的情况下，协调二者之间的关系，使其共同推动社会公平正义的实现，成为当前亟特研究与解决的理论与现实问题。本论文由当前引发社会舆论广泛关注与激烈讨论的吴英案入手，对大量真实案例进行了调查和研究，通过深入分析，揭示出媒体监督与司法审判冲突的原因和实质，结合国外实践与国际准则，提出了调和二者冲突的思路与对策。论文共分为五个部分，第一部分为问题的缘起，主要介绍和分析了吴英案及由此引发的思考。第二部分则分别对媒体监督和司法审判进行了概述，明确了媒体对司法审判进行监督的实质，指出这种监督的法律依据是公民享有的表达自由、知情权、参与和监督国家与社会事务的权利以及司法公开原则。同时，，明确了司法审判应该坚持独立、公开和公正的原则和价值追求。第三部分主要对四个典型案件——孙伟铭案、胡斌案、许霆案和药家鑫案进行了深入的解读。第四部分则基于前述典型案例的分析，揭示出媒体监督与司法审判产生冲突的原因和实质。第五部分主要分析了国外在二者关系中的立法和实践，以及当前的得到普遍认可的国际准则，进而提出我国应该从解决路径的法治化、媒体监督司法的文化建设和我国的实际情况出发，分别从六个方面采取措施寻求二者冲突的调和。本论文从理论和实际相结合的角度出发，从个案分析深入阐释了媒体监督与司法审判冲突产生的原因、实质和解决对策，对于实现媒体与司法的良性互动，具有重要的理论和现实意义。
[Abstract]:Media supervision and judicial trial is an indispensable part of modern society ruled by law, and also an important way and guarantee to realize social fairness and justice. With the development of Chinese society, the enhancement of citizen's right consciousness and the loosening of public opinion environment, the initiative and enthusiasm of media supervision and judicature in our country have been greatly improved, and the conflicts between the two have been increasing day by day. In the case of frequent conflicts between the media and the judiciary, it has become a theoretical and practical problem to coordinate the relationship between the media and the judiciary so that they can jointly promote the realization of social fairness and justice. This paper begins with the Wu Ying case, which has aroused widespread concern and intense discussion in the public opinion at present, investigates and studies a large number of real cases, and through in-depth analysis, reveals the causes and essence of the conflict between media supervision and judicial trial. Combined with foreign practice and international standards, this paper puts forward some ideas and countermeasures for reconciling the conflict between the two. This paper is divided into five parts, the first part is the origin of the problem, mainly introduces and analyzes the case of Wu Ying and the resulting thinking. The second part summarizes the media supervision and judicial trial, clarifies the essence of media supervision, points out that the legal basis of this kind of supervision is the freedom of expression and the right to know. The right to participate in and monitor state and social affairs and the principle of judicial openness. At the same time, it is clear that judicial trial should adhere to the principle of independence, openness and impartiality and value pursuit. The third part mainly analyzes four typical cases-Sun Weiming case, Hu Bin case, Xu Ting case and Yao Jiaxin case. The fourth part reveals the causes and essence of the conflict between media supervision and judicial trial based on the analysis of the above typical cases. The fifth part mainly analyzes the foreign legislation and practice in the relationship between the two, as well as the current universally accepted international standards, and then puts forward that our country should rule by law from the path of solution. Starting from the cultural construction of media supervision and the actual situation of our country, we take measures from six aspects to seek reconciliation between the two conflicts. From the angle of combination of theory and practice, this paper deeply explains the causes, essence and solution of the conflict between media supervision and judicial trial from the perspective of case analysis, which is helpful to realize the positive interaction between media and judicature. It has important theoretical and practical significance.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926.2;G206

【相似文献】