再审检察建议若干问题研究
发布时间：2018-08-07 09:54
【摘要】：再审检察建议是地方各级人民检察机关认为同级人民法院已生效的判决、裁定、调解书存在抗诉的法定情形,建议人民法院进行再审,人民法院如果认为检察建议确有道理,从而采纳检察机关的意见,依职权启动再审的一种监督方式。再审检察建议源于审判监督权,属于法律监督权的范畴,法律效力相对抗诉柔性,应赋予程序上的强制力。 通过对江苏省南京市13个基层检察院和无锡市9个基层检察院的再审检察建议运行情况的实证研究,这项制度在办案规模、操作规则、民行检察人员素质等方面存在一些共性的问题。在适用中需要注意：正确认识再审检察建议的意义；严格再审检察建议实体标准,细化再审检察建议程序规则；建立法检的沟通协调机制；重视文书说理；充分发挥和解、调解的作用；健全跟踪机制；完善多元化监督工作格局。 2012年8月,《民诉法》全面修改,新法用三个条款在适用范围、申请条件、操作规则和检察机关调查权等方面对再审检察建议作出了规定。此次民诉法全面修订,极大地提升了民事检察监督权在民事诉讼领域的角色。首先,监督的方式上,检察建议“入法”,弥补了抗诉的不足,解决了基层人民检察院无法直接行使民事行政检察监督权的问题；其次,监督的范围上,将生效调解书正式纳入检察监督的范畴,并且将检察机关的监督范围从对法院的生效法律文书的监督扩大到对审判人员的违法行为的监督,从对审判活动的监督拓展到对执行行为的监督；再次,监督的时间上,检察机关对审判监督程序以外的其他审判程序中审判人员的违法行为发生时就可以进行监督,改变了民诉法修改前我国检察监督事后监督的定位,从事后监督向实时监督延伸。但是也存在具体操作规则不完善等问题,如果没有更为具体的可操作的规定,可能成为空洞的监督框架,在实践中难以取得实效,达不到预期的监督效果。
[Abstract]:A retrial of a procuratorial proposal is a judgment that the people's procuratorial organs at various local levels consider that the people's court at the same level has already taken effect, ruling that there is a statutory situation of protest in the mediation statement, and suggesting that the people's court conduct a retrial. If the people's court considers that the procuratorial proposal is justified, Thus adopting the opinion of procuratorial organ, initiate a kind of supervision way of retrial ex officio. The procuratorial suggestion of retrial comes from the right of judicial supervision and belongs to the category of legal supervision. The legal effect is relatively flexible and should be endowed with procedural compulsion. Through an empirical study on the operation of the retrial and procuratorial proposals of 13 grass-roots procuratorates in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, and 9 grass-roots procuratorates in Wuxi, this system is on the scale of handling cases and operating rules. There are some common problems in the quality of procuratorial personnel. In application, attention should be paid to: correctly understanding the significance of retrial procuratorial suggestions; strictly enforcing the substantive standards of retrial procuratorial suggestions, refining the procedural rules of retrial procuratorial suggestions; establishing a mechanism for communication and coordination of legal procuratorial proposals; attaching importance to the reasoning of documents; giving full play to reconciliation, The role of mediation; perfect tracking mechanism; improve the pattern of diversified supervision. In August 2012, the Civil procedure Law was comprehensively revised, the new law uses three provisions in the scope of application, application conditions, Operating rules and procuratorial organs investigation power and other aspects of the retrial procuratorial recommendations made provisions. The comprehensive revision of the Civil procedure Law has greatly enhanced the role of civil procuratorial supervision in the field of civil litigation. First, in terms of the way of supervision, the procuratorial proposal of "entering the law" makes up for the deficiencies in the protest and solves the problem that the grass-roots people's procuratorates cannot directly exercise the power of civil administrative procuratorial supervision; secondly, in the scope of supervision, To formally bring the effective mediation statement into the scope of procuratorial supervision, and to extend the scope of supervision of the procuratorial organs from the supervision of the effective legal documents of the court to the supervision of the illegal acts of the judicial personnel, From the supervision of trial activities to the supervision of execution; thirdly, in terms of the time of supervision, the procuratorial organs can supervise the illegal acts of the trial personnel in other judicial proceedings other than the judicial supervision procedures. It changed the position of the supervision after the procuratorial supervision before the revision of the civil procedure law and extended from the post-supervision to the real-time supervision. However, there are also some problems, such as imperfection of specific operation rules. If there is no more specific operational regulation, it may become an empty supervision framework, which is difficult to achieve actual results in practice and can not achieve the expected supervision effect.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.1;D926.3
本文编号：2169658
[Abstract]:A retrial of a procuratorial proposal is a judgment that the people's procuratorial organs at various local levels consider that the people's court at the same level has already taken effect, ruling that there is a statutory situation of protest in the mediation statement, and suggesting that the people's court conduct a retrial. If the people's court considers that the procuratorial proposal is justified, Thus adopting the opinion of procuratorial organ, initiate a kind of supervision way of retrial ex officio. The procuratorial suggestion of retrial comes from the right of judicial supervision and belongs to the category of legal supervision. The legal effect is relatively flexible and should be endowed with procedural compulsion. Through an empirical study on the operation of the retrial and procuratorial proposals of 13 grass-roots procuratorates in Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, and 9 grass-roots procuratorates in Wuxi, this system is on the scale of handling cases and operating rules. There are some common problems in the quality of procuratorial personnel. In application, attention should be paid to: correctly understanding the significance of retrial procuratorial suggestions; strictly enforcing the substantive standards of retrial procuratorial suggestions, refining the procedural rules of retrial procuratorial suggestions; establishing a mechanism for communication and coordination of legal procuratorial proposals; attaching importance to the reasoning of documents; giving full play to reconciliation, The role of mediation; perfect tracking mechanism; improve the pattern of diversified supervision. In August 2012, the Civil procedure Law was comprehensively revised, the new law uses three provisions in the scope of application, application conditions, Operating rules and procuratorial organs investigation power and other aspects of the retrial procuratorial recommendations made provisions. The comprehensive revision of the Civil procedure Law has greatly enhanced the role of civil procuratorial supervision in the field of civil litigation. First, in terms of the way of supervision, the procuratorial proposal of "entering the law" makes up for the deficiencies in the protest and solves the problem that the grass-roots people's procuratorates cannot directly exercise the power of civil administrative procuratorial supervision; secondly, in the scope of supervision, To formally bring the effective mediation statement into the scope of procuratorial supervision, and to extend the scope of supervision of the procuratorial organs from the supervision of the effective legal documents of the court to the supervision of the illegal acts of the judicial personnel, From the supervision of trial activities to the supervision of execution; thirdly, in terms of the time of supervision, the procuratorial organs can supervise the illegal acts of the trial personnel in other judicial proceedings other than the judicial supervision procedures. It changed the position of the supervision after the procuratorial supervision before the revision of the civil procedure law and extended from the post-supervision to the real-time supervision. However, there are also some problems, such as imperfection of specific operation rules. If there is no more specific operational regulation, it may become an empty supervision framework, which is difficult to achieve actual results in practice and can not achieve the expected supervision effect.
【学位授予单位】：南京师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D925.1;D926.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙祥壮;;理想与现实之间:民事再审程序的再修改[J];法律适用;2011年07期
2 汤维建;;审判监督程序立法修改五题[J];法律适用;2011年10期
3 李浩;;虚假诉讼中恶意调解问题研究[J];江海学刊;2012年01期
4 虞政平;;论我国审判监督程序的改革[J];暨南学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年08期
5 李德恩;李江宁;陈祺;;论再审检察建议的制度化[J];吉首大学学报(社会科学版);2012年05期
6 周有智 ,王忠华;关于适用再审检察建议的调查与分析[J];人民检察;2005年20期
7 俎静峰;;论个案再审检察建议的适用[J];人民检察;2006年09期
8 吴锋;孔丽丽;;民事再审检察建议的问题与出路[J];人民检察;2008年14期
9 程晓璐;;检察机关刑事再审检察建议的适用[J];人民检察;2009年21期
10 马荣;韩俊;;论司法建议的法律效力[J];人民司法;2011年21期
，本文编号：2169658
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2169658.html
