我国司法裁判方法研究
发布时间：2018-08-25 13:56
【摘要】：公平与正义的司法理念是古老而永恒的主题,从私力救济发展到依靠国家公权力来保障人类的各项权利是人类文明的巨大进步。司法裁判的理性路径如何实现,法官运用何种裁判方法针对具体案件做出判决,是司法裁判的重要论题。 司法三段论作为我国当前法官裁判的主要方式,日益凸显出的其弊端,并日益受到来自理论界与实践界的质疑。本文通过五部分的论证试图找出我国司法裁判方法困境的出路。 本文第一部分主要对本文的选题背景,研究的意义,研究的目的和研究方法进行简单的介绍。第二部分是对司法裁判的一般理论的概述。通过对司法、裁判、司法裁判概念的分析,对司法裁判过程的剖析,将司法裁判方法予以说明。第三部分是西方司法裁判方法模式的概述。在这一部分共区分了三种研究方法：逻辑的、修辞的、对话的。文章首先对三种方法内容进行了介绍,其次对三种方法在法学中的应用给予了评价。在修辞对话中主要针对传统司法三段论的由来与发展进行概述,指出司法三段论在运用中的不同。修辞对话中,通过对佩雷尔曼的新修辞学和哈贝马斯的论辩、理想言谈情境的引入对此概念展开。并指出这三种方法在法学领域中的应用。第四部分主要论述我国采用的司法裁判方法的现状以及存在的问题。第五部分是在以上四部分的基础上指出我国司法裁判方法改革的出路所在。
[Abstract]:The judicial concept of fairness and justice is an ancient and eternal theme, from private relief to relying on the state public power to protect the human rights is the great progress of human civilization. How to realize the rational path of the judicial decision and what kind of judgment method the judge uses to make the judgment in the specific case is an important topic of the judicial judgment. Judicial syllogism, as the main way of judge judgment in our country, increasingly highlights its disadvantages, and is increasingly questioned by the theoretical and practical circles. This paper tries to find out the way out of the dilemma of judicial judgment method in our country through five parts of argumentation. The first part introduces the background, significance, purpose and method of this paper. The second part is an overview of the general theory of judicial decision. Through the analysis of the concepts of judicature, adjudication and judicature, the paper explains the method of judicial adjudication. The third part is the summary of the western judicial adjudication method model. In this part, there are three research methods: logical, rhetorical and conversational. This paper first introduces the contents of the three methods, and then evaluates the application of the three methods in the field of law. In rhetorical dialogue, the origin and development of traditional judicial syllogism are summarized, and the differences in the application of judicial syllogism are pointed out. In rhetorical dialogue, the concept is developed by the introduction of ideal discourse context through the argument of Perelman's new rhetoric and Habermas's argument. The application of these three methods in the field of law is pointed out. The fourth part mainly discusses the present situation and existing problems of the judicial adjudication method adopted in our country. The fifth part is based on the above four parts to point out the way out of the reform of judicial adjudication method in our country.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926
本文编号：2203079
[Abstract]:The judicial concept of fairness and justice is an ancient and eternal theme, from private relief to relying on the state public power to protect the human rights is the great progress of human civilization. How to realize the rational path of the judicial decision and what kind of judgment method the judge uses to make the judgment in the specific case is an important topic of the judicial judgment. Judicial syllogism, as the main way of judge judgment in our country, increasingly highlights its disadvantages, and is increasingly questioned by the theoretical and practical circles. This paper tries to find out the way out of the dilemma of judicial judgment method in our country through five parts of argumentation. The first part introduces the background, significance, purpose and method of this paper. The second part is an overview of the general theory of judicial decision. Through the analysis of the concepts of judicature, adjudication and judicature, the paper explains the method of judicial adjudication. The third part is the summary of the western judicial adjudication method model. In this part, there are three research methods: logical, rhetorical and conversational. This paper first introduces the contents of the three methods, and then evaluates the application of the three methods in the field of law. In rhetorical dialogue, the origin and development of traditional judicial syllogism are summarized, and the differences in the application of judicial syllogism are pointed out. In rhetorical dialogue, the concept is developed by the introduction of ideal discourse context through the argument of Perelman's new rhetoric and Habermas's argument. The application of these three methods in the field of law is pointed out. The fourth part mainly discusses the present situation and existing problems of the judicial adjudication method adopted in our country. The fifth part is based on the above four parts to point out the way out of the reform of judicial adjudication method in our country.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 季卫东;;法律程序的形式性与实质性——以对程序理论的批判和批判理论的程序化为线索[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年01期
2 葛洪义;试论法律论证的源流与旨趣[J];法律科学.西北政法学院学报;2004年05期
3 焦宝乾;;逻辑、修辞与对话:法律论证的方法[J];厦门大学法律评论;2005年02期
4 罗书平;裁判文书与诉讼证据[J];法律适用(国家法官学院学报);2002年05期
5 夏锦文;现代性语境中的司法合理性谱系[J];法学;2005年11期
6 孙笑侠;司法权的本质是判断权——司法权与行政权的十大区别[J];法学;1998年08期
7 韩登池;;批判与拯救:司法三段论的当代法治命运[J];河北法学;2010年03期
8 郑永流;法律判断形成的模式[J];法学研究;2004年01期
9 焦宝乾;当代法律方法论的转型——从司法三段论到法律论证[J];法制与社会发展;2004年01期
10 管伟;;略论中国传统司法裁判中的事实判断及其方法[J];政法论丛;2010年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 崔军;论司法裁判[D];吉林大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 郝志刚;试论哈贝马斯的程序主义法律范式[D];山东大学;2007年
2 刘强;司法裁判与修辞论证[D];西南政法大学;2010年
3 王坤;关于我国司法审判中的法律推理研究[D];西南政法大学;2010年
，本文编号：2203079
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2203079.html
