论民意对审判的影响
[Abstract]:With the progress of the rule of law in China, people's demand for justice is becoming more and more obvious. When a case closely related to the people occurs, people feel that they have some degree of contact with themselves, and will actively participate in the discussion of the case, so that the case will produce a fair judgment. This paper mainly focuses on the analysis of the formation process of public opinion, and on this basis. The relationship between public opinion and trial is discussed.
By analyzing the formation of public opinion, the author understands the basic formation process of public opinion. First of all, public opinion is formed on the basis of groups. The characteristics of individual individuals in this group include: the formation of a special collective mentality after the disappearance of individual mentality, these people with the same collective mentality will often enter a state of organized psychological groups; the conscious personality of the group will gradually disappear, the unconscious personality will gradually gain momentum; and These characteristics of the group directly lead to the public opinion has obvious moral, changeable, emotional characteristics are particularly prominent, easy to be guided by the media or expert opinions and other external factors. Secondly, the "catalyst" for the formation of public opinion is the media. The selectivity, depth and the effectiveness of the results of media reports make the media itself have a strong function of information dissemination, which contributes to the formation of public opinion to a certain extent.
The theoretical basis analysis of public opinion mainly includes the analysis of the source of public Opinion-the idea of freedom and the legal basis of public Opinion-the right to freedom of speech. It is in this sense that only one person with a free idea expresses his own views on the object he is facing. These views, through certain ways of interaction, reach a consensus on the core, and form a group sense of public opinion. The continuous development of human society helps and guarantees that freedom of speech can provide a better environment for the healthy growth of individuals and maintain social stability for society.
In the judicial field, the intervention of public opinion inevitably has an impact on judicial independence, judicial justice and judicial authority. The independence of power, and public opinion before the trial of the case produced a preconceived moral evaluation of the case, directly affecting the judges and the Judicial Committee on the case's cognition. The influence of public opinion on judicial authority is reflected in the independence of courts and the fairness of judicial results. Negative influence hinders the independence of the court, impairs the trial procedure and results, and weakens the judicial authority. In view of the negative influence of public opinion on the trial, the author conducts a preventive study from the institutional level. For example, to improve the system of remote jurisdiction, to improve the people's jury system, to strengthen the written judgment. The reasonability of the book and the perfection of the press spokesman system.
This paper is mainly innovative in the study of groups, because the basis of public opinion is the group, and only a thorough study of the group can form a comprehensive understanding of public opinion. Leader's role, group norms and special decision-making mechanism of the group.Through the analysis of the group's more than the whole people, we can get the essential attributes of public opinion, such as emotional, easy to guide.In the relationship between public opinion and trial, we focus on the relationship between public opinion and judicial independence, judicial justice and judicial authority. Two factors.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张顺;;解构司法民意[J];安徽大学法律评论;2010年02期
2 苏力;;基层法院审判委员会制度的考察及思考[J];北大法律评论;1998年02期
3 侯健;;言论自由及其限度[J];北大法律评论;2000年02期
4 李华;严红;;和谐社会更需网络民意的合理表达[J];湖北社会科学;2006年08期
5 李国慧;曹颖逊;;第五次全国行政审判工作会议在北京召开[J];法律适用;2007年05期
6 陈树森;;博弈与和谐:穿行于法意与民意之间的司法[J];法律适用;2009年09期
7 汪习根;在冲突与和谐之间——对司法权本性的追问[J];法学评论;2005年05期
8 周永坤;;民意审判与审判元规则[J];法学;2009年08期
9 金悦;;精英、民意与陪审制度[J];法制与社会;2007年03期
10 王群;王卉;;民意抑或法意——法官审判中的选择困境[J];湖南公安高等专科学校学报;2010年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 湖北经济学院院长、教授 吕忠梅;[N];人民法院报;2009年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 顾学松;寻求舆论监督与司法公正的平衡[D];吉林大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 李振雨;现代法治视野下的民意与司法关系研究[D];中南民族大学;2010年
2 蒋剑华;舆论监督与司法独立[D];吉林大学;2006年
3 刘晶明;舆论与司法公正[D];吉林大学;2007年
4 林兵;寻求民意与司法公正的平衡[D];吉林大学;2008年
5 陈晓梅;司法语境中的民意考量[D];烟台大学;2009年
6 程轶楠;“媒体审判”及其防范[D];吉林大学;2010年
7 张敏;司法与民意的关系探究[D];陕西师范大学;2010年
本文编号:2233684
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2233684.html