我国能动司法若干问题的思考
发布时间：2018-09-10 08:27
【摘要】：在当今中国实行能动司法,面临着司法能动与司法克制两种不同司法理念的争论,这场争论直接关系到我国司法体制改革与司法制度建设的历史进程。历史要求我们在中国司法语境下,从法学理论与法律实践的结合上,客观分析能动司法的比较优势,科学做出能动司法的模式选择,深入研究适度能动司法的价值取向。在此基础上,积极探寻我国能动司法的合理途径和科学方式。
[Abstract]:To carry out active judicature in China today, we are faced with two different judicial concepts: judicial initiative and judicial restraint, which is directly related to the historical process of judicial system reform and judicial system construction in China. History requires us to analyze objectively the comparative advantages of active judicature in the context of Chinese judicature and from the combination of legal theory and legal practice, to make the mode choice of active judicature scientifically, and to deeply study the value orientation of moderately active judicature. On this basis, we actively explore the rational way and scientific way of active judicature in our country.
【作者单位】： 南京理工大学人文与社会科学学院;
【分类号】：D926
[Abstract]:To carry out active judicature in China today, we are faced with two different judicial concepts: judicial initiative and judicial restraint, which is directly related to the historical process of judicial system reform and judicial system construction in China. History requires us to analyze objectively the comparative advantages of active judicature in the context of Chinese judicature and from the combination of legal theory and legal practice, to make the mode choice of active judicature scientifically, and to deeply study the value orientation of moderately active judicature. On this basis, we actively explore the rational way and scientific way of active judicature in our country.
【作者单位】： 南京理工大学人文与社会科学学院;
【分类号】：D926
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 林U，
本文编号：2233913
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2233913.html
