审判如何回应民意——基于卢埃林情景感理论的考察

发布时间：2018-09-10 14:14

【摘要】：近些年来,民意与司法之间的冲突难题不断在一些影响性诉讼中展现出来。在实践层面上,民意作为一种大众话语的表达,追求个案的解决和个案结果的实体正义,很少考虑法律通过个案判决对将来的整体示范作用和法律程序本身的意义;而司法权作为一种宪法位阶之裁判权,其行使过程只能是法官职业思维的实践,注重逻辑和证据,谨慎对待情感因素,并通过程序进行思考。在理论层面上,民意与审判的冲突却是由于社会公众与法官对法律确定性问题的认识不同所造成的。卢埃林的情景感理论就是要帮助法官实现对法律和对正义的双重职责,帮助社会公众理解法院的判决,满足社会公众的确定性需求。法官运用情景感在一定程度上已经体现了民意,因此法官要做的并非曲意迎合民意,而是通过一系列法律方法的运用将对民意的考量转化为法律的要求以理性应对民意。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the conflict between public opinion and justice has been exposed in some influential litigation. On the practical level, public opinion, as an expression of public discourse, pursues the solution of individual cases and the substantive justice of the results of individual cases, and seldom considers the significance of the law in passing a case judgment to the whole demonstration function of the future and the legal procedure itself. Judicial power, as a kind of constitutional jurisdiction, can only be exercised through the practice of judges' professional thinking, paying attention to logic and evidence, treating emotional factors with caution, and thinking through procedure. On the theoretical level, the conflict between public opinion and trial is caused by the different understanding of the legal certainty between the public and the judge. Llewellyn's situational sense theory is to help the judge to realize the dual duties of law and justice, to help the public understand the judgment of the court, and to meet the deterministic needs of the public. To a certain extent, the judge has already reflected the public opinion by using the sense of scene, so what the judge should do is not to pander to the public opinion, but to use a series of legal methods to transform the consideration of public opinion into the request of law to deal with the public opinion rationally.
【作者单位】：昆明理工大学法学院;
【基金】：云南省社会科学研究基金资助项目(KKSY201224007) 昆明理工大学引进人才基金资助项目(KKSY201224007)
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】