对“刘涌案”的法律问题分析

发布时间：2018-09-13 15:01

【摘要】：现今社会互联网高度发达,信息传播方式发生了前所未有的改变,网络媒体更是形式多样,其监督作用越来越受到公众的接受和重视。网络媒体为公众提供了一个自由、平等的交流空间和平台,公众可以在这里进行信息传播和意见发表。对某一事件的意见在网络媒体中集合形成民意,进而形成无法忽视的监督力量,引起相关部门的重视,从而推动事件的发展和解决。司法权是现代国家权力的重要组成部分,司法有腐败,媒体可监督。网络媒体对司法权的行使就是一个很好的监督,但网络媒体监督是否会影响到司法独立,如何实现网络媒体监督与司法独立之间的和谐互动,构成了我国在社会主义法治国家建设过程中必须完满解决的一个新课题。本文绪论部分阐述了本课题的选题背景、研究现状、研究意义、研究方法、和研究成果；第一章介绍了“刘涌案”的基本案情及相关问题的法理思考；第二章对本案的相关问题进行法理思考的具体分析；第三章给出了实现我国网络媒体监督与司法独立之间和谐互动的具体建议。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, the Internet is highly developed, the way of information dissemination has been changed unprecedented, the network media is more and more diverse, and its supervisory role has been accepted and paid more and more attention by the public. Internet media provide a free and equal communication space and platform where the public can disseminate information and express their opinions. The opinions on a certain event gather in the network media to form the public opinion, and then form the supervision force which can not be ignored, and arouse the attention of the relevant departments, thus promoting the development and solution of the incident. Judicial power is an important part of modern state power, judicial corruption, media can be supervised. The exercise of judicial power by network media is a good supervision, but whether network media supervision will affect judicial independence, how to realize the harmonious interaction between network media supervision and judicial independence, It constitutes a new subject that must be solved perfectly in the process of building a socialist country ruled by law. The first chapter introduces the basic facts of the Liu Yong case and the legal considerations of the related issues. The second chapter gives a concrete analysis of the relevant issues in this case; the third chapter gives specific suggestions to realize the harmonious interaction between the network media supervision and judicial independence in China.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：D926

【参考文献】