当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 司法论文 >

试论中国医疗纠纷ADR解决机制的构建

发布时间:2018-09-14 15:11
【摘要】:随着社会主体关系、社会利益和冲突的多元化发展,,医学科学的不断进步,我国迫切需要对现行的医疗纠纷处理机制进行相应的改革、完善。而ADR(AlternativeDispute Resolution)——诉讼外纠纷解决机制所具有的专业、快捷、简便及保密性强等优势特性,在纠纷解决方面逐渐崭露头角,逐渐成为许多国家和地区解决民事纠纷的重要方式。根据我国的具体国情和实际状况,在医疗纠纷领域引入ADR是帮助医疗纠纷解决更加有效、快速地进行。但是,引入并建立我国医疗纠纷ADR解决机制必须符合我国国情和医疗纠纷的特殊成因和性质。 本文通过文献回顾的方法取得最新研究数据和有关法律法规,并在通过理论分析,寻找医疗纠纷ADR解决机制不足之处,并提出改进建议。全文约2万字,除引言和结语,正文共有五个部分。主要内容如下: 第一部分探讨医疗纠纷的概念并分析形成的原因,目的在于明确我国医疗纠纷的实质及其特殊性质,便于针对性的构建、完善非讼解决机制。第二部分通过分析司法诉讼、医患双方自行协商、行政机关调节等我国现有的三种医疗纠纷解决方式现状,检讨现行解纠模式存有的缺漏;第三部分通过分析ADR的特质和优势,结合医疗纠纷的特点和冲突根源,分析在解决医疗纠纷方面适用ADR的意义所在;第四部分是通过分析我国现有医疗诉讼ADR解决机制的模式,发现存在的问题,并获取外国医疗纠纷ADR解决模式进行对符合我国国情和实际的解决机制的借鉴和启示;第五方面是对于如何进一步完善医疗纠纷ADR解决机制的建议,其中提出三点意见:第一,是要坚定第三方调解机构客观中立立场;第二,是要加强第三方调解机构专业人才保有和培育;第三,是建立医疗纠纷ADR解决机制完善的配套连接系统。
[Abstract]:With the pluralistic development of social interests and conflicts, and the continuous progress of medical science, China urgently needs to reform and perfect the current medical dispute handling mechanism. ADR (AlternativeDispute Resolution)-the dispute settlement mechanism outside litigation has the advantages of professionalism, convenience, confidentiality and so on. It has gradually emerged in dispute resolution and become an important way to solve civil disputes in many countries and regions. According to our country's specific national conditions and actual conditions, the introduction of ADR in the field of medical disputes is to help resolve medical disputes more effectively and quickly. However, the introduction and establishment of medical dispute ADR resolution mechanism must conform to the national conditions of our country and the special cause and nature of medical dispute. This paper obtains the latest research data and relevant laws and regulations through the method of literature review, and through theoretical analysis, finds out the deficiency of ADR resolution mechanism of medical disputes, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. The full text is about 20, 000 words, except the introduction and the conclusion, the text has five parts. The main contents are as follows: the first part discusses the concept of medical disputes and analyzes the reasons for their formation, the purpose of which is to clarify the essence and special properties of medical disputes in China, to facilitate the construction of targeted, and to improve the non-litigation resolution mechanism. The second part reviews the defects in the current mode of resolving medical disputes by analyzing the current situation of three kinds of medical dispute resolution methods, such as judicial litigation, consultation between doctors and patients, adjustment of administrative organs, etc. In the third part, the characteristics and advantages of ADR are analyzed. Combined with the characteristics of medical disputes and the root causes of conflicts, the significance of applying ADR in resolving medical disputes is analyzed. The fourth part is to find the existing problems by analyzing the mode of ADR solution mechanism of medical litigation in our country. And to obtain the foreign medical dispute ADR solution model for China's national conditions and the actual solution mechanism for reference and inspiration; the fifth aspect is how to further improve the medical dispute ADR resolution mechanism, which puts forward three suggestions: first, It is necessary to strengthen the objective neutral position of the third-party mediation organization; second, to strengthen the third party mediation organization professional talent retention and cultivation; third, to establish a complete ADR medical dispute resolution mechanism of the supporting connection system.
【学位授予单位】:西南政法大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D926

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 高尚;罗潇;孙建;;人民调解介入医疗纠纷处理的背景、现状与发展[J];中国司法;2012年05期

2 杜宏伟,王国华,张建东;规范医疗责任保险化解医疗风险[J];口岸卫生控制;2005年02期

3 ;人民调解 破解医患纠纷的新途径——宁波市医疗纠纷人民调解委员会工作纪实[J];宁波通讯;2008年09期

4 李卓凝;张转利;;医法结合是医疗纠纷鉴定的必然趋势[J];中国司法鉴定;2009年06期

5 曾彩琼;李正新;;医疗纠纷上升原因探析[J];西部医学;2006年02期

6 杨帆;刘茜;杨天潼;郑娜;杜飞;李姗姗;刘良;;日本的医疗责任保险制度及对我国的启示[J];医学与社会;2008年10期

7 陈翰丹;;论医疗纠纷人民调解机制的完善[J];医学与哲学(人文社会医学版);2011年07期

8 郑渊,雷晓坤;日本的医疗纠纷处理与防范机制及其对我国的启示[J];中国医院管理;2004年12期

9 张萌;吴雪松;;医疗事故鉴定的证据作用[J];中国医院管理;2006年10期

10 曹杰;方鹏骞;高昭f;刘敬;高明;;医疗纠纷的非诉讼处理机制(ADR)适用优势研究[J];中国医院管理;2009年12期



本文编号:2243075

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2243075.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户80281***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com