论我国刑事陪审制度的完善

发布时间：2018-10-16 12:23

【摘要】：刑事陪审制度作为民众参与刑事司法的一种形式,已被世界上许多国家所采用。我国在积极构建和谐社会的同时,提出了建设民主法治的要求,而刑事陪审制度恰恰能够吸纳民众参与司法,拉近民众与司法的距离,真实体现民主法治的精神和基本要求。但是,我国的刑事陪审制度并非完美无缺,在立法和实际运行中还存在诸多的不足,与民主法治建设的要求尚有一定距离。因此,本着革除弊端,发扬优点,完善我国的刑事陪审制度的目的,笔者撰写了此文。本文首先对刑事陪审制度做了概括介绍,而且阐述了刑事陪审制度在我国的现状；并通过对世界上其它国家(尤其是法国、德国的刑事参审制和日本的人民裁判员制度)刑事陪审制的现状进行分析,企图为我国刑事陪审制的完善和发展找到可供借鉴的模式。当然,要对一项制度加以改革,必先了解改革的弊病和其产生的原因,因此,笔者用大量的篇幅阐述了我国刑事陪审制度运行的特点,指出了运行过程中存在的诸多问题以及出现这些问题的原因,以便对症下药,为我国刑事陪审制度的完善提出合理的建议。本文共分为以下四个部分。第一部分,笔者介绍了陪审制的渊源和概念界定。第二部分,详细介绍了法国、德国的刑事参审制和日本的人民裁判员制度,作为我国完善刑事陪审制的参照。第三部分,主要介绍了我国刑事陪审制的发展概况、运行特点、实践中存在的问题以及原因分析。第四部分,从刑事诉讼制度发展和完善大方向入手,提出了完善我国刑事陪审制的立法建议。关于刑事陪审制度的完善,笔者将其放在整个刑事诉讼制度的大环境下进行考量,而区别于以往一些学者提出的“头痛医头,脚痛医脚”而难以从根本上解决问题的做法。因此,笔者不但提出了关于人民陪审员制度的一些完善立法的意见,而且提出了改革和完善相关刑事诉讼制度的建议,以期通过系统的改革,收到更好的效果。具体建议和意见如下：首先是我国刑事陪审合议庭的审判程序,从审前程序到审判过程再到案件的评议和表决,都要完善。其次是我国参审员的资格和选任也要进行改革,最后是其他一些配套的措施,比如法制宣传和刑事诉讼制度的改革等。
[Abstract]:As a form of public participation in criminal justice, the criminal jury system has been adopted by many countries in the world. While China is actively building a harmonious society, it puts forward the requirement of building democracy and rule by law, while the criminal jury system can absorb the public to participate in the administration of justice, narrow the distance between the public and the judiciary, and truly reflect the spirit and basic requirements of democracy and the rule of law. However, China's criminal jury system is not perfect, there are still many shortcomings in the legislation and practical operation, and there is still a certain distance from the requirements of the construction of democracy and rule of law. Therefore, in order to eliminate the drawbacks, carry forward the advantages and improve the criminal jury system, the author wrote this article. This article first makes the general introduction to the criminal jury system, and expounds the present situation of the criminal jury system in our country, and through to other countries in the world (especially France, The present situation of criminal jury system in Germany and Japan is analyzed in an attempt to find a model for the perfection and development of criminal jury system in China. Of course, in order to reform a system, we must first understand the shortcomings of the reform and the reasons for its emergence. Therefore, the author devoted a lot of space to expounding the characteristics of the operation of the criminal jury system in China. This paper points out many problems existing in the course of operation and the causes of these problems in order to give the right remedy and put forward reasonable suggestions for the perfection of the criminal jury system in our country. This article is divided into the following four parts. In the first part, the author introduces the origin and definition of jury system. In the second part, the author introduces the criminal trial system in France and Germany and the people's referee system in Japan as the reference to improve the criminal jury system in our country. The third part mainly introduces the development of criminal jury system in China, the characteristics of operation, the problems in practice and the analysis of the reasons. The fourth part, from the criminal procedure system development and consummation general direction, proposed consummates our country criminal jury system legislation suggestion. As to the perfection of the criminal jury system, the author puts it under the general environment of the whole criminal procedure system, but it is difficult to solve the problem fundamentally, which is different from the way that some scholars put forward "treating head pain, treating foot and foot". Therefore, the author not only puts forward some opinions on perfecting the legislation of the people's jury system, but also puts forward some suggestions on the reform and perfection of the relevant criminal procedure system, in order to get better results through the systematic reform. The specific suggestions and opinions are as follows: first, the trial procedure of our country's criminal jury panel, from the pretrial procedure to the trial process, to the case evaluation and voting, should be improved. Secondly, the qualification and selection of assessors should also be reformed, and finally some other supporting measures, such as legal publicity and the reform of criminal procedure system, should be carried out.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】