论我国法院非诉化调解制度的建构

发布时间：2018-10-17 21:48

【摘要】：随着社会主义和谐社会的构建和发展,近年来,法院非诉化调解制度在我国得到了迅速发展,其中有许多理论与实践中的问题需要研究和解决,笔者拟就此做些探讨。全文共分四章,现分述如下：第一章首先介绍法院非诉化调解制度的概念,并与诉讼和解、诉讼调解、人民调解等相关制度相比较,厘清制度本身的内涵。其次阐述法院非诉化调解的意义,包括维护当事人最大利益,保障当事人程序选择权,降低纠纷解决成本；合理配置司法资源,提高法院纠纷解决能力,保障司法效益最大化；缓解当事人的对抗心理,实现法院诉调对接,促进社会和谐稳定。第二章考察了其他国家和地区在法院非诉化调解实践中所采用的模式,通过对大陆法系和英美法系国家在法院非诉化调解制度施行中的异同比较和认识研究,取长补短,借鉴德国的起诉前强制调解制度、日本的民事调停制度、台湾的诉前调解制度以及美国的法院附设调解制度和英国的法院非诉化调解制度,以期建构出适合我国国情的法院非诉化调解制度。第三章介绍并评述了最高人民法院对我国法院非诉化调解制度的有关司法解释,包括对委托调解和司法确认的规定,并评述了法院非诉化调解在上海、北京、广东、甘肃等地的操作实践,主要以浦东新区人民法院“诉前调解”程序、朝阳区人民法院诉前调解模式、东莞市第二人民法院矛盾纠纷解决体系以及定西市中级人民法院“诉前司法确认机制”为典型代表。本文第四章从经济、价值以及功能三个方面对我国法院非诉化调解制度建构的原理进行分析,并试图从调整具体制度、改进辅助措施两个角度出发建构并完善我国现行的法院非诉化调解,促使其更好的发挥调解作用。
[Abstract]:With the construction and development of the socialist harmonious society, in recent years, the court non-litigation mediation system has developed rapidly in our country, and there are many problems in theory and practice that need to be studied and solved. This paper is divided into four chapters. The first chapter introduces the concept of the non-litigation mediation system of the court, and compares with the related systems, such as litigation settlement, litigation mediation, people's mediation and so on, and clarifies the connotation of the system itself. Secondly, it expounds the significance of non-litigation mediation, including safeguarding the best interests of the parties, ensuring the parties' choice of procedure, reducing the cost of dispute resolution, rationally allocating judicial resources, improving the ability of court dispute resolution, and ensuring the maximization of judicial benefits. Alleviate the antagonistic psychology of the parties, realize the docking of court suit, and promote social harmony and stability. The second chapter investigates the models adopted by other countries and regions in the practice of non-litigation mediation in court. Through the comparison and study of the similarities and differences between the civil law system and the Anglo-American law system in the implementation of the non-litigation mediation system in the court, we can learn from each other's shortcomings. Drawing lessons from Germany's pre-lawsuit compulsory conciliation system, Japan's civil mediation system, Taiwan's pre-litigation mediation system, the United States' court-attached mediation system and the British court non-litigation mediation system, In order to construct the court non-litigation mediation system suitable for the situation of our country. The third chapter introduces and comments on the Supreme people's Court's judicial interpretation of the non-litigation mediation system in our country, including the provisions on entrustment mediation and judicial confirmation, and comments on the court non-litigation mediation in Shanghai, Beijing, Guangdong. In Gansu and other places, the procedure of "pre-litigation mediation" by the Pudong New area people's Court and the pre-litigation mediation mode of the Chaoyang District people's Court are mainly used. The conflict and dispute settlement system of the second people's Court of Dongguan City and the judicial confirmation mechanism of the Dingxi Intermediate people's Court are typical representatives. The fourth chapter analyzes the construction principle of the non-litigation mediation system in our country from three aspects of economy, value and function, and tries to adjust the concrete system from the aspects of economy, value and function. Improve the auxiliary measures from two angles to construct and perfect the current court non-litigation mediation, to promote its better play the role of mediation.
【学位授予单位】：复旦大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D926.2

【参考文献】