知识产权案件审判模式改革研究

发布时间：2018-10-18 08:27

【摘要】：知识产权关乎自主创新,关乎民族产业的发展,更关乎创新型国家建设及国际交往中的经济安全。从1985年起至今,全国知识产权案件增长幅度剧烈。然而国内知识产权案件审判模式现状呈现出理想与现实的差距,在司法实践领域,三类性质的知识产权案件涉及两级法院多次审理,在法律理论界,学者积极进行设立知识产权专门法院的设计,而实务界关于"三审合一"模式的探讨打造了一座理论联系实际的桥梁。但是,知识产权案件存在的交叉问题、确权矛盾和同案不同判的后果却不容忽视。在分析了国内知识产权案件现状及德日等国的审判模型后,分别在知识产权系统设置、法理基础、调解原则、确权研究和人才培养五个方面提出建议,以期能够使知识产权审判模式更加完善。
[Abstract]:Intellectual property is related to independent innovation, the development of national industries, innovative national construction and economic security in international exchanges. Since 1985, intellectual property cases have increased dramatically nationwide. However, the current situation of the trial mode of domestic intellectual property cases presents a gap between ideal and reality. In the field of judicial practice, three types of intellectual property rights cases involving two levels of courts have been tried many times, and in the legal theoretical circle, Scholars actively set up a special court for intellectual property rights, and the discussion of the mode of "three trials in one" has created a bridge between theory and practice. However, the intersecting problems of intellectual property cases, the contradiction of confirmation rights and the consequences of different judgments in the same case can not be ignored. After analyzing the current situation of intellectual property cases in China and the trial models of Germany and Japan, the author puts forward some suggestions in five aspects: the establishment of intellectual property system, the legal basis, the principle of mediation, the research of affirmative right and the cultivation of talents. In order to make the intellectual property trial model more perfect.
【作者单位】：江苏省知识产权研究中心;江苏大学法学院;
【分类号】：D926.2;D923.4

【参考文献】